|
Should producers DJ?
I was thinking the other day that DJs and crowds would be a lot better off if producers stayed in their studios and didn’t play gigs.
Disregarding the fact that DJing is a money-maker and this is how most producers earn their living, the biggest problem with producers playing DJ sets is that the crowd expects certain things from them. Irrespective of whether you’re seeing Tiesto, LTJ Bukem or Gui Boratto, the knowledgeable people in the audience will general be split into two opposing mindsets: ‘he didn’t play x and y classics that I wanted to hear’ and ‘he only played all his old shit that we’ve heard a million times.’
It seems to me that having prior experience with a producer’s work tends to ruin the experience of seeing them play, because you’re expecting something in particular from them and are likely to be disappointed.
Some of the best shows I’ve ever been to have been those where I’ve been completely ignorant of who I’m seeing and what kind of stuff they play. Shouldn’t the point of DJing be to hear a well-crafted, coherent set with all the elements being equal rather than waiting for a producer to drop his big hit and passing over everything else he plays? These days I’ve often found that the local nobody playing the warm up set entertains me far more than the international headliner, again the result of me having no prior expectations.
Perhaps this is my fault for pidgeon-holing producers without considering their overall merits, but I have noticed that most people tend to do this too. It seems a bit inevitable. To be clear, I’m talking about DJ sets, not live shows like Underworld and the like.
Thoughts?
|