|
| quote: | Originally posted by cryophonik
A little from column A and a little from column B. |
+1
I think, to a large part, I pretty much have done some form of modulation of synth and sampler parameters for about every (95%) of my productions - to the point that, for the most part, the sound I wind up with is indistinguishable from the sound I started with - be it a preset or one of my own saved tweaks.
The cool thing about it is that the longer I own a synth, the more of my own presets are stored on it so I'll find myself flipping through those when I'm looking for a sound palette to start with.
I read, somewhere, a long, long time ago, that every time Depeche Mode got a new synth Alan Wilder would just delete all the presets that came along with it and start from scratch - when that was possible. That approach, I think, is what helped them to give a voice to their music. It allowed them to form an identity because they basically forced themselves to forge it.
I'm sure a little of that applies to me. What I've found, for the most part, however, is that synth manufacturers tend to want to impress potential buyers, so they'll make all of these really cool sounding "show-room" instruments that have a lot of layers and modulations running throughout the depression of the keys. While I think such an approach is excellent for show-casing a synth's capabilities, I have generally found very little use for these presets.
They just don't fit into the mix.
I've found that songs I make sound better with everything tailored for the mix I'm going for.
___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012
|