|
Re: Why do people say things like "I'm mixing at -4db"?
| quote: | Originally posted by Richard Butler
I'm in danger of sounding like a nooob but I'm now getting around to considering the 'what level should I mix at debate'.
Anyway, a guy I respect a lot who remixed my latest release was saying this to me >
" Still a loit to learn but getting more and more brutal at the initial phase of adding sounds is the way to go - if you add a sound and it causes the master to jump over 0dB then you compress, EQ or get rid until you're back at 0dB. At the moment I think my best effort has been mixing down at -4dB (so the spikes dont jump over 0dB) but trying to get that to -1dB, then I think my mix quality should be up there with the best. Takes a lot of patience!"
I have NO knowledge about this mixing at a lower level lark and trying to ensure you don't exceed -1 (or whatever). Why is this important? REMEMBER HE MEANS WITHOUT ANYTHING ON THE MASTER BUSS - NO COMPRESSOR - JUST PURE MIXING - HE DOES LATER MASTER IT. |
Everyone is always learning.
Levels in digital don't have that same significance as they do in analog. Most DAWs are 32 bit float, including Cubase so they only thing you have to worry about is that your master does not clip and any channels you overload on your plug ins can handle. Most plug ins can handle overs, so that's not usually a problem.
If the master starts clipping, all you have to do is lower the master channel. With this in mind, my guess is that the mixer was trying to rely on individual treatment of sounds to try and get it sounding louder rather than relying on some sort of dynamic treatment on the master channel.
Some people mix at a lower volume on their monitors so that they have compensate for the lack of volume with judicious amounts of compression, and that raises the loudness of the song.
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_alfi
change your avatar for fucks sake. |
|