 |
|
|
|
 |
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
Sep-01-2011 15:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Guest
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Johan (DJ Irish)
Agreed, but it's been like that for a while now hasn't it? For me his relevancy kind of ended during the 90s. Not sure when or why. I'd still go and see him at a club if I had the chance (unless there's a ridiculous ticket price) as I still think he throw down some interesting sets
On the other hand, he never really hit it off as a producer ever did he? His draw has always been as a DJ, never as the creator of some hit track. So perhaps his relevancy has never been in the traditional sense to begin with |
Good analysis.
|
|
Sep-01-2011 15:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
stevö
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Sep 2009
Location: floriduh
|
|
|
Sep-01-2011 15:47
|
|
|
 |
 |
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by stevö
what is this relevancy thing you guys speak of? what does that mean exactly? he packs clubs and tents because when he plays he causes large masses of bodies to move non stop, and thats the most important thing. |
It means his incidence with currently popular trends, which is usually an important part of both measuring and maintaining success. Nobody talks about Carl Cox - there's no journalistic features by him, no threads about him, no artists mention him in interviews, he doesn't seem to feature highly on popularity polls, no matter who is being polled. I don't see his records in shops anymore, he doesn't come up on Beatport or Amazon. He seems to be completely irrelevant to everything happening in dance music, which would normally mean his popularity would go down. Certainly if I were just getting into dance music in 2011 Carl Cox would not register as a major DJ.
This was a guy, don't forget, who was once #1 on the DJ Mag poll, who spent so much time on the front cover of Mixmag he took out a mortgage on it, who had cameos in films like Human Traffic and It's All Gone Pete Tong. In the late '90s, you couldn't get away from Carl Cox. Compared to those days, he's totally invisible. How do people know he "he causes large masses of bodies to move non stop" when nobody talks about him? Is he just drawing the same crowd every year?
___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24
Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/
|
|
Sep-01-2011 16:11
|
|
|
 |
 |
stevö
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Sep 2009
Location: floriduh
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
It means his incidence with currently popular trends, which is usually an important part of both measuring and maintaining success. Nobody talks about Carl Cox - there's no journalistic features by him, no threads about him, no artists mention him in interviews, he doesn't seem to feature highly on popularity polls, no matter who is being polled. I don't see his records in shops anymore, he doesn't come up on Beatport or Amazon. He seems to be completely irrelevant to everything happening in dance music, which would normally mean his popularity would go down. Certainly if I were just getting into dance music in 2011 Carl Cox would not register as a major DJ.
This was a guy, don't forget, who was once #1 on the DJ Mag poll, who spent so much time on the front cover of Mixmag he took out a mortgage on it, who had cameos in films like Human Traffic and It's All Gone Pete Tong. In the late '90s, you couldn't get away from Carl Cox. Compared to those days, he's totally invisible. How do people know he "he causes large masses of bodies to move non stop" when nobody talks about him? Is he just drawing the same crowd every year? |
thanks for that explanation. i now know that relevancy is irrelevant to me (as in, not important to me).
he's probably still popular because he does a good job keeping a dancefloor moving without resorting to cheesy vocals, or churning out releases that aspire to be innovative but end up not being actually good music. it sounds like carl cox's story is a great one that says: even in this day and age, word of mouth and actually doing a good job as a dj carries more weight in the long run, than what magazines and media choose to cover.
it sounds like relevancy = putting out releases or pioneering a new sound, because that's what grabs the media's attention and gets you mentioned in interviews and gets people talking about you. skrillex is a good example of that.
|
|
Sep-01-2011 16:48
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:38.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|