|
| quote: | Originally posted by LiquidX
This its got nothing to do wether Bush's comment helps or not the education. If, like you said, which is not at all true, that teachers are overpaid, maan, your lucky, if you've got a degree allready. Theres no incentive for good teachers to be teachers if they are going to get paid CRAP. If they get paid less, the results are ... the worst education on the world, undeveloped country kind of education. And yes, kidds in the USA are not as smart as kidds from other countries ( we all know ) .. and thats because of the EDUCATION SYSTEM of this country, not the teachers, teachers just obey what has to be done. |
The changes that ought to be made are ones that would be politically unpopular (actually, I don't think class size is even one of those problems, as I find I learn much better in a college classroom with 100 students than a high school classroom with 20), hence, Bush is not in a position to even consider them an option (unless he would put what ought to be done ahead of what he can benefit from implementing, but lets face it, he's not going to). Now, his reasoning is pretty dumb, because it's basically a false dichotomy, but I really don't think that lowering teachers' salaries is going to decrease the quality of education. Few, if any, individuals who chose a career in education do so for economic reasons, even at this juncture. So any discouragement a further reduction of salary would provide would likely have limited impact on the actual productivity of workers. The reason that teachers are being overpaid is because of organized labor (I'll forgo my usual diatribe against that). They ought to be paid the fair value of their labor, which at the moment simply is not much.
Getting into the fundamental issues behind why education has become a relatively week career sector is a bit too complex a topic for me to undertake during exam week, but I'll try to get back to you afterwards if I remember. 
Cheers,
Arbiter
|