Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > NATO breakup?
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
malek
drinks your milkshake!



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Montréal
Question NATO breakup?

After the fall of the Soviet empire, NATO's place as a military pact and alliance became less obvious. Many considered that its end would be near. NATO was created to oppose the waraw act and to protect western countries from the Soviet menace. If one member NATO country is attacked, the rest of the members automatically declare war on the attacker.

In these days of turmoil surrounding war on Iraq, the alliance is shaken more than ever because its member cannot agree with each other. I am saying this because as Turkey is entering the war against Iraq, the US is asking NATO to fullfill its mandate by declaring war on Iraq at the sides of the US/Britain. Paris, Berlin and Burxelles just said that they will vetoe this, driving the American furious.

If effectively, France, Germany and Belgium vetoe such an action wouldn't the NATO alliance be over because its member do not support/protect each other (its original mandate)? What do you all think?


___________________
[/IMG]http://i54.tinypic.com/ngycqo.png[/IMG]

Old Post Feb-10-2003 06:08 
Click Here to See the Profile for malek Click here to Send malek a Private Message Visit malek's homepage! Add malek to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Deez
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Re: NATO breakup?

quote:
Originally posted by ahlamalek
If one member NATO country is attacked, the rest of the members automatically declare war on the attacker.

If effectively, France, Germany and Belgium vetoe such an action wouldn't the NATO alliance be over because its member do not support/protect each other (its original mandate)? What do you all think?


No, because of the first statement. Iraq did not attack us, so there is no mandate for all NATO members to go to war. Sure it would be nice to have their support, but it is not required. If Iraq gave a weapon to a terrorist and that weapon was used in a NATO country (like many of the member governments fear could happen) then the mandate would hold true. But aside from that, NATO is too important economically to fall apart.

Isn't it ironic that Russia is now a member (although not completely) of NATO as well

Old Post Feb-10-2003 06:30  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Deez Click here to Send Deez a Private Message Add Deez to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
malek
drinks your milkshake!



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Montréal

well the US is asking NATO to participate in the war because Turkey will be in it... and 3 countries will veto it. That's the whole point of my thread. Also NATO is strictly a military pact, not an free trade pact. Russia is an observer at NATO, not a member.


___________________
[/IMG]http://i54.tinypic.com/ngycqo.png[/IMG]

Old Post Feb-10-2003 07:14 
Click Here to See the Profile for malek Click here to Send malek a Private Message Visit malek's homepage! Add malek to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
cweb
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2001
Location: hasle, switzerland

No, the question is: will the NATO respond with military actions if Iraq, who would be in war with the USA, launch an attack on Turkey. D, BE and F do not say they will not respond, they say its not good to clarify this at this point of time. But they didnt say they wouldnt do anything!

Of course they would and should do something if that happens, or else the nATO is indeed a relict of the past.

But the US administration just dig frurther and further, they have no diplomacy whatsoever. This war against terror in general was supposed to bring the civilisized world together, but the contrary happens at the moment. thats not just the fault of the USA, because, Germany and France made diplomatic failures as well, but they are big time responsible for that.

Now its the time for the US to decide if they want go to isolation with the thinking of "we are the best and everybody else doesnt matter", or if they want to act in an united western world.


___________________
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness - only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate - only love can do that... The chain reaction of evil--hate begetting hate, wars producing more wars--must be broken, or we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation." - Martin Luther King, Jr.

Old Post Feb-10-2003 07:54  Switzerland
Click Here to See the Profile for cweb Click here to Send cweb a Private Message Visit cweb's homepage! Add cweb to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
malek
drinks your milkshake!



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Montréal

this just in, France and Belgium just opposed a formal veto about reinforcing the defence of Turkey.

man its 6am , i need some sleep


___________________
[/IMG]http://i54.tinypic.com/ngycqo.png[/IMG]

Old Post Feb-10-2003 10:50 
Click Here to See the Profile for malek Click here to Send malek a Private Message Visit malek's homepage! Add malek to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DrUg_Tit0
e^(i*pi)+1=0



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

I think NATO really is a relict of the past, because its original purpose has no meaning anymore. And with all the joining of the new members from former eastern block it seems like it wants to take over the purpose of the UN.


___________________
1+1=10

Old Post Feb-10-2003 13:53  Croatia
Click Here to See the Profile for DrUg_Tit0 Click here to Send DrUg_Tit0 a Private Message Add DrUg_Tit0 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Deez
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Las Vegas, NV

quote:
Originally posted by ahlamalek
well the US is asking NATO to participate in the war because Turkey will be in it... and 3 countries will veto it. That's the whole point of my thread.


and like I said before, unless Saddam actually attacks a member country, either via terrorism or does it himself (very unlikely outside of war), there is no requirement for NATO to send military aid. When push comes to shove, ALL NATO countries will be there.

quote:
Originally posted by ahlamalek
Also NATO is strictly a military pact, not an free trade pact.


There are a lot of economic benefits for countries to be in NATO, especially for the poorer nations . It is not trade, it is in the form of military aid (equipment) and financial support.

quote:
Originally posted by ahlamalek Russia is an observer at NATO, not a member.


That is why I said they are "not completely a memebr". They let them in, but don't let them vote. I was just saying who would have ever thought it would come that far? You people need to lighten up...

Old Post Feb-10-2003 17:23  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Deez Click here to Send Deez a Private Message Add Deez to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
malek
drinks your milkshake!



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Montréal

quote:
Originally posted by 00GSR
and like I said before, unless Saddam actually attacks a member country, either via terrorism or does it himself (very unlikely outside of war), there is no requirement for NATO to send military aid. When push comes to shove, ALL NATO countries will be there.


I'll repeat myself once more, the US asked expressly to the NATO members to prep up immidiatly to defend Turkey. Nobody attacked Turkey, but the US still wants NATO to join in, *just in case*.

Belgium, France and Germany vetoe that motion this morning causing quite a stir between its member.


___________________
[/IMG]http://i54.tinypic.com/ngycqo.png[/IMG]

Old Post Feb-10-2003 21:24 
Click Here to See the Profile for malek Click here to Send malek a Private Message Visit malek's homepage! Add malek to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ste
Planet Zogg Addict



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Outer Dementia

america has used NATO as its diplomatic excuse bitch for too long.

i wish tony blair would stop going along with george wanker bush.


___________________
Fave Tune at the Moment: Mesmerizer - Taking Control

>>> Download my mix here <<< (Electro, Techno & Psy-Trance)

Old Post Feb-12-2003 00:21  England
Click Here to See the Profile for Ste Click here to Send Ste a Private Message Visit Ste's homepage! Add Ste to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
King_Mack
Professor of Pimpology



Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Rasta

^^

blair is being a total puppet.


___________________

Old Post Feb-12-2003 00:34  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for King_Mack Click here to Send King_Mack a Private Message Add King_Mack to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > NATO breakup?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

 
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackhardtrance tune id from 2000? [2004] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackMicah - "Hallowmind" (Arksun Remix) [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 13:55.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!