|
| quote: | Originally posted by TranceGiant
No, BUSH is NOT on top, my friend. It's his administration which also consists of intelligent, open minded and responsible politicians and advisers. I don't really like this trendy Bush-hysteria...it's not that simple at all. There's definitely no black and white (intelligent, caring Europe vs. idiot greedy Bush) situation as suggested by many America-critics. And I repeat: Yes I prefer a clear world order with the world as a globalized multicultural village (totally cooperating in fields of politics and economy education and science) with the USA as world sheriff. Simply because the UN has proved itself impotent and hypocritical, mainly navigated by self interests. An insecure world (terrorism anyone?) requires a stable hard rule and the USA as the leading democracy is not always perfect but definitely the lesser evil.
But okay, people who're happy about the current changes will soon enough regret this dangerous move. I see Bin Laden laughing his ass off at the collapse of the trans-atlantic alliance and the upcoming chaos. Basically what us Westerns have started is a process of self destruction. |
- Its Bush the one that wants to go to WAR without a UN resolution if not given. Its Bush the one that is willing to go without the international support, see, I hate when people, say that its the UN's fault to what its coming to, but if you didnt know, the UN is an institution, where order should be put on place, and evade any conflict, war and do thinks pacifically. Then, if thinks dont work under the OUTLINES placed, then they should go to war, but with INTERNATIONAL support. I mean, I understand what France wants to do and so on. TranceGiant, I want you to show me DATA and PROOF, yes, CONCRETE proof and evidence, some of which Powell said that Iraq is building missils while they also destroy. Why Powell does not send that information to Blix and then shove it off his face?? Come on, Blix clearly said that DATA and Evidence should be given to them so they could act accordingly. Come on!!!!!!! its obviously Bush the one acting in a way that he shouldnt. He is a big hole now and he cant just get out of it. And trancegiant, you are like blaming France and Germany almost as supporters for terrorism. France, Germany and Russia will send special equipment to dissarm IRaq. USA has the most advance technology and intelligence, and they CANT detect CHEMICAL WEAPONS?!?! COme on!! they claim some of the most ambitious satellite pictures, yet they are not given to guide the inspectors.. why?? because they have none and cant find none, they just assume. So Im on France position and every other country when it comes to WHY and SHOW ME THE PROOF TO INDEED ATTACK IRAQ. There is none, all Bush says is that " since 9/11, everything changed, and the AMERICAN PEOPLE know better" .. but why Iraq??? ITs true that the US has to protect itself, but not going to war with whomever it wants. I would support more getting that Chavez guy out of Venezuela, which by the way is CUBA#2( And Bush claims he is so against Fidel Castro.. uhum.. right he shows it with ignoring Venezuela right) .. Bush had the support to attack Afghanistan because there was proof to do it, but Iraq is different, just think of the factos before saying something.... you are so proud of heaving the US been police, yet you dont really see the other face of things.
- Bush also says that there's been 12 years, but during those 12 years there wasent any pressure basically from any country for Iraq to disarm, you cant expect to say that Iraq has been udner the same pressure that its now constantly under.. I think that with the US pressure on Iraq now, and the strong inspections, things will flow to air, but WAR?? ppshhh..
___________________
Upcoming:
Michael Andrews Feat. Gary Jules - Mad World (Grayed Out Mix)
|
WTF???
