|
whats the difference between techno and trance? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Sirocco |
| quote: | Originally posted by SuperFarStucker
how is this a hard question???
techno in general is much more percussive and harder / abrasive than trance. from my understanding most trance is within a specific BPM range also (120's-130's?) and techno varies more or is within a completely different range. IANADJ but they have a totally different 'sound' altogether, and i think as a finer point there are some notable structure differences (though i couldn't tell you exactly what)...:eyespop: :eyespop: |
120-130
lol.......u thinkin of house man? |
|
|
| mndeg |
whats the difference between death metal and pop?
techno is the complete opposite of trance
chances are you will never meet someone that listens to techno in your life |
|
|
| Halcyon21 |
ive seen this posted before and i think its an apt description of the difference between the two
techno= _______________________________
trance= ___^^^^_______^^^^^________^^^^
:D :D |
|
|
| DamnDirtyApe |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon21
ive seen this posted before and i think its an apt description of the difference between the two
techno= _______________________________
trance= ___^^^^_______^^^^^________^^^^
:D :D |
??? Care to elucidate? |
|
|
| Dave Albert |
| quote: | Originally posted by mndeg
chances are you will never meet someone that listens to techno in your life |
Are You Serious?
Techno is the .
Anyone wanting to experience the difference for themselves grab a Chris Liebing or DJ Rush set for a clear definition of what techno is.
If you want trance, grab a Tiesto, Corsten, AVB, PVD, etc set. |
|
|
| UWM |
I used to think techno was garbage until I listened to a Chris Liebing set ... totally gave me respect for the genre.
I might suggest if you want to slowly delve into techno, start out with something like Bryan Zentz - D-Clash .. fairly well known, not too 'abrasive' :p |
|
|
| mndeg |
pfffffftttttt
im the only person at my school that listens to trance, about 1/100 people on TA listen to techno
so odds are you will never meet someone that listens to techno in your life (if you live in america)
i didnt imply that techno was a bad genre i was saying that not a lot of people listen to it
popularity doesnt = quality of course |
|
|
| arctic |
| Wouldn't that apply to trance as well then? |
|
|
| Spad |
| quote: | Originally posted by ASOT100
I think of techno as not very unique hard stuff while trance is somewhat sofer, deeper and more complex, placing a greater sense of emotion in the listener. er, thats what I came up with off the top of my head :haha: |
Trance more complex than techno :conf: |
|
|
| Purple_Heart |
Techno = Disco in disguise....
Trance = Mozart, Beethoven in disguise....
(Just my point of view, both are good in there own why - I just have disco :eek: )
:whip: |
|
|
| noonboy |
listen to these two tunes:
marco v - revolt and paul van dyk - another way
i hope u got my point |
|
|
| Dj_Psygnosis |
| quote: | Originally posted by red eyed phil
whats the difference between techno and trance? |
Techno doesn't make sense
Trance makes sense in a good sense. |
|
|
|
|
