|
What's your Screen resolution? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| TwoPlow |
| 1024x768. Monitor isn't big enough for anything larger. |
|
|
| goodnet |
2 monitors at 1152 x 864
I know what you're all thinking:
"'ey maw! Lookit 'dis boy with the wiiiieerd screen res-o-lution!" |
|
|
| politcs_of_danc |
| 1024*768 19" flat screen |
|
|
| quddha |
1600x1200
always design so that its still useable at 800x600, cuz alot of people still use taht res. but makes ure its still useable at high resoultions as well, like 1600x1200. |
|
|
| UWM |
320 X 240
God bless the 386sx. |
|
|
| trance[]control-fan |
| 1600X1200 @ 75HZ |
|
|
| magnasoma |
If you are designing a website that has to be seen by the general public, and used by them, rather than just for friends whatever then you need to design for an 800x600px screen.
That gives you (under windows & mac, ie, nn, op & moz) a piece of screen real-estate 750px wide.
Height-wise you'll get 430px before the 'fold' - which is the point that a browser will add a vertical scrollbar at that resolution.
--
If you are designing a site for yourself you can go up to 1024x768px, which gives you a piece of screen-real estate somewhere around 970x590px. |
|
|
| Fundamental |
| 1024 x 768 on the two PCs here and 1280 x 1024 at home. |
|
|
| Fraggle |
hmm 1600x1200 here (w000t 19" flat :))
but after 2 years, i've found...
code:
1. 1024x768 830.00 38.68%
2. 800x600 445.00 20.74%
3. 1280x1024 317.00 14.77%
4. 1152x864 281.00 13.09%
5. n/a 130.00 6.06%
6. 1280x960 44.00 2.05%
7. 1600x1200 41.00 1.91%
8. 640x480 36.00 1.68%
9. 1400x1050 8.00 0.37%
10. 1152x900 3.00 0.14%
11. 960x720 2.00 0.09%
12. 1152x768 2.00 0.09%
13. 1152x870 2.00 0.09%
14. 1280x768 1.00 0.05%
15. 1280x854 1.00 0.05%
16. 1056x792 1.00 0.05%
17. 1920x1440 1.00 0.05%
18. 240x320 1.00 0.05%
Total 2,146 100.00%
just from my hit counter
|
|
|
| Fundamental |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fraggle
but after 2 years, i've found...
|
Jaisus Fraggle. Haven't seen you post in ages! Where have you been? |
|
|
|
|
