|
Concerning the TA's Unite series
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Mr.Mystery |
No, I'm not doing the next one yet :rolleyes:
It's just that I've been thinking the whole concept of the TA's Unite series and I thought I'd put up a small query to hear your opinions. What started as a little project for my own enjoyment is now growing to something much bigger.
So, if you are interested about the future of the series please take few minutes of your time and answer these questions:
(And please, no BS in this thread)
1. The Concept
I have been thinking about this and can't make up my mind. What do you think is better - having 1 continuous mix like I have done so far or 2-3 CD length mixes?
2. The DJ
As you might now I'm not a real DJ. I have done the previous mixes digitally and I know some people here don't really appreciate it. Therefore I think it's necessary to ask whether you'd like a "real" DJ (please post ideas about who would be a good DJ) to do it or shall I just keep doing it like I have been?
3. Selection of tunes
The original idea of the unite project was to have as many of you on the mix as possible. This means I only rejected tunes that were impossible to mix, horribly mastered or they had glitches in them, everything else was accepted. Do you think that should still be the policy or should I/whoever is doing it only pick the best of the best?
4. Any other comments
If you have anything else to comment on about previous mixes, future mixes or anything concerning the mixes. Positive or negative.
Thanks for your time,
Nik |
|
|
| Eugene |
I think you should only pick the best tracks.
It's true some people may get offended that their track wasn't included, but on the other hand they will have true reason to celebrate when they make it in the mix. It will mean they've improved and their track *really* sounds good (not just to them).
Till then they will have the incentive to continue working and aspiring. |
|
|
| DJPrototypeX |
1. The Concept
i love the one continuous mix, but it would be really sweet if it was CD lengths to burn. i listened to Part2, and the whole time i was thinkin bout splittin it to jam in the car.
2. The DJ
digitally mixed is ok with me. how would a "DJ" mix these anyway? still, many people dont like CDJs. My 2cents. it sounds great either way. i dont mind.
3. Selection of tunes
If the song isnt mastered, it shouldnt be included, but if the person is havin a hard time masterin it, maybe some help would be great. if they are on mp3 format, and one is better quality than the song before it, it sounds aweful. but also, if a tune is amazin, but the mastering is pure crap, someoen should help master it.
4. Any other comments
no comments, but that i cant wait to hear the next one:D:D:D |
|
|
| MaRt |
Let's see. :rolleyes:
The Concept
I'm tempted to say that having two or three CD-length mixes is better. This would probably benefit narrowband users and would also allow for easier burning. I suppose what it really comes down to though is whether people would rather listen to separate shorter sets or a single long set. Perhaps each mix could concentrate on a particular sub-genre, or something.
The DJ
I'd rather you mix it digitally than listen to a set full of pitch bending and screw-ups...:p If you go with the multiple sets idea then I wouldn't mind having a go at mixing one in Traktor, but then I'm not a real DJ either, and I've probably made people laugh already by just suggesting that.
Suggestion of Tunes
Hmm...I think that there should definitely be a level of 'quality control', but nothing too drastic. Otherwise it'll end up being an Icone megamix or something...:eek: Also, I think that artists should be allowed to submit remixes of other amateur productions with the original artists' permission.
Any other Comments
I'm bored - if you want me to help then Yo! :toothless |
|
|
| S2K |
1. I personally like the idea of one continous set. Something about that concept just feels right, rather than splitting things up. It's not the end of the world for burners, as they can split the mp3, it's not gonna destroy the mix drastically...
2. Definitely digital mixing. This is not a showcase of DJing skills, it's a showcase of production. Of course the transitions need to sound good, but in this situation digital mixing is far more approriate, and doesn't take anything away from the mix.
3. A difficult one if people aren't willing to accept that they don't "make the grade". I think as many artists as possible should be included, and not simply the best tracks however. The important part however is to ensure a boundary for quality.. if the track fails to meet the basic standards it can be rejected.
4. None really, however seeing as I missed the last one, count me in for the next! :D |
|
|
| dbl |
1. The Concept
i think that it's good as it is now, however, like some said, it could, be nice with CD lenght on it so that you can burn it.
but i don't really care.
2. The DJ
i think you should just keep doing it like you have done.. it sounds good and like S2K said, it's not a Djing skills showcase.. it's for production
3. Selection of tunes
i think it is good as it is now, that almost all track's is getting in... but if the mastering or something else with the track is really wrong and almost impossible to mix in, it isn't added to the mix... althou, it would be nice with not really a "best of the best" caus then it would be like MaRt said, a white sun megamix or something... oh... it said Icone... ehmmm :rolleyes:
hehehehe :p
but something like that could be nice sometime :)
4. Any other comments
hmmm... nope.. no other comments... |
|
|
| auujay |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJPrototypeX
[color=#00ff00][b]
2. The DJ
digitally mixed is ok with me. how would a "DJ" mix these anyway? still, many people dont like CDJs. My 2cents. it sounds great either way. i dont mind.
[color] |
Well I recently bought FinalScratch, so I could mix these on real turntables. However, number 1, as was said this is a production showcase and not about the DJing and number 2, while I do not suck at mixing I do not think I am confident enough to make a good enough mix "Live" that would be worth for everyone to burn and pound in there car.
On the other notes, mainly I think there needs to be some level of quality control of the tracks. |
|
|
| DJRavemonkey |
1. Yeah i agree that it should just be one long continuous mix, just works better and as others have said if people wanna burn then can split it up
2. while i do agree with the fact that it isnt the djing skills on show here, if it was decided to be mixed then i would be more than happy to do so. I have CD Decks and check out the Gabriel & Dresden mix up for download atm for the standard i can mix at. Most people have given positive comments.
3. I think only the better tunes should be used. If people dont make the grade it should give them some drive to make their productions technically better in the future (atleast thats wot it would do for me) |
|
|
| sym |
I think that a DJ should do it. Sure it isn't a show of DJ ability, but DJs are a big part of the scene. Having a DJ do it just sorta adds to the power of the mix in my view. Also, DJ Ravemonkey's G&D megamix was very good, and he is one of the best DJs on the board IMO, so if we go that route, I'll vote for him! :)
I think CD Length Mixes would be better. Wouldn't this also make it easier to mix? That way you don't exclude tracks that aren't mixable?
IE. Have a Hard Mix, a Chill Mix, a Prog Mix. Etc.
I also think there should be some type of quality control while still including as many people as possible. |
|
|
| arctic |
| quote: | Originally posted by sym
I think that a DJ should do it. Sure it isn't a show of DJ ability, but DJs are a big part of the scene. Having a DJ do it just sorta adds to the power of the mix in my view. Also, DJ Ravemonkey's G&D megamix was very good, and he is one of the best DJs on the board IMO, so if we go that route, I'll vote for him! :)
I think CD Length Mixes would be better. Wouldn't this also make it easier to mix? That way you don't exclude tracks that aren't mixable?
IE. Have a Hard Mix, a Chill Mix, a Prog Mix. Etc.
I also think there should be some type of quality control while still including as many people as possible. |
No way, sorry, but i think that's rubbish.
Mr. M has done a fantastic job mixing so far, and it's much better to listen to without any skips etc. The songd ovbiously arent on vinyl as well, so a vinyl dj couldn't do it anyway.
I don't have an opinion on the mix length, and i do think thaqt SOME minimal quality control should be exercised. As in, if its a really crappy track, then just say no. |
|
|
| sym |
| quote: | Originally posted by arctic
No way, sorry, but i think that's rubbish.
Mr. M has done a fantastic job mixing so far, and it's much better to listen to without any skips etc. The songd ovbiously arent on vinyl as well, so a vinyl dj couldn't do it anyway.
I don't have an opinion on the mix length, and i do think thaqt SOME minimal quality control should be exercised. As in, if its a really crappy track, then just say no. |
Not saying he hasn't done a fantastic job, Just that a "real" DJ has more experience with transitions, and might be able to do some interesting things. Anyways, It's just IMO :) |
|
|
| Endre |
3.
i have nothing to say about the first 2 things, but the tracks, as said before ppl should get help with mastering and stuff, cause, who judge what is good or not? i think many will be offended, personaly i don't give a if i would not be included for example, cause i know what i can do and so on, but those who have hard time with something and work really hard, i feel sorry if some dude just say " off, your not good enough for this cd". some bad tunes here are really kickass if you help 'em out a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
