|
9/11 Report: "No Iraq Link to al-Qaida"
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Renegade |
| quote: | WASHINGTON, July 23 (UPI) -- The report of the joint congressional inquiry into the suicide hijackings on Sept. 11, 2001, to be published Thursday, reveals U.S. intelligence had no evidence that the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein was involved in the attacks, or that it had supported al-Qaida, United Press International has learned.
"The report shows there is no link between Iraq and al-Qaida," said a government official who has seen the report.
[...]
The revelation is likely to embarrass the Bush administration, which made links between Saddam's support for bin Laden -- and the attendant possibility that Iraq might supply al-Qaida with weapons of mass destruction -- a major plank of its case for war.
"The administration sold the connection (between Iraq and al-Qaida) to scare the pants off the American people and justify the war," said Cleland. "What you've seen here is the manipulation of intelligence for political ends."
[...]
Although the committee completed its work at the end of last year, publication of the report has been delayed by interminable wrangles between the committees and the administration over which parts of it could be declassified.
Cleland accused the administration of deliberately delaying the report's release to avoid having its case for war undercut.
"The reason this report was delayed for so long -- deliberately opposed at first, then slow-walked after it was created -- is that the administration wanted to get the war in Iraq in and over ... before (it) came out," he said.
"Had this report come out in January like it should have done, we would have known these things before the war in Iraq, which would not have suited the administration." |
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID...23-064812-9491r
Hands up all those who are suprised?
It's a serious issue though - how much fabricated evidence was presented to the people of the world (if we include this and the WMD malarky) with no-one genuinely stepping forward and claiming responsibility? If Clinton can get impeached for lying about a blow-job, surely Bush must be taken to task over his false comments about Iraq's WMD capabilities and its connection to al-Qaida? |
|
|
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by Renegade
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID...23-064812-9491r
Hands up all those who are suprised?
It's a serious issue though - how much fabricated evidence was presented to the people of the world (if we include this and the WMD malarky) with no-one genuinely stepping forward and claiming responsibility? If Clinton can get impeached for lying about a blow-job, surely Bush must be taken to task over his false comments about Iraq's WMD capabilities and its connection to al-Qaida? |
I am not surprised at all....its kinda sickening.
I think the US administration who forwarded this attack on Iraq should have their throats slit infront of the world. |
|
|
| rizen |
yawn :o
| quote: | | Originally posted by Cyrus King I think the US administration who forwarded this attack on Iraq should have their throats slit infront of the world. |
reported to the secert service :p |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
I dont think this admin will ever admit that they are wrong about anything.
They just gonna go on and say make up some other bull,and blame it on another country!!:whip: |
|
|
| drgoodvibe |
| Its funny, I was actually waiting for them to say that all of Iraqs WMDs had been moved into Syria and they have to go regime change Syria.. This whole entire matter is a farce now.. the people have been lied to blatantly and yet they still support the current admin. |
|
|
| LiquidX |
| Im not surprised at all, many of us knew this allready, and have discussed and kinda faught over this. |
|
|
|
|
