|
Figure these out and ill give you my TTs (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| drizzt81 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Linx_da_cat
he's roadkill under my tire. |
pics! |
|
|
| Linx_da_cat |
| quote: | Originally posted by drizzt81
pics! |
 |
|
|
| Mako |
| quote: | Originally posted by Linx_da_cat
|
*fap...err no.. eww :S |
|
|
| drizzt81 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Linx_da_cat
|
Linx delivers all the time :D |
|
|
| You aint Ninja |
The first one isn't a paradox.
Depends how you read it I suppose. |
|
|
| Boomer187 |
the second one is an example of the stroop effect. Thats where you are supposively "automatically processing" the word's meaning so that interferes with tring to name the color of the word. Works pretty much all the time and there has been like 700-800 published articles on it.
eh, and who cares about the first one. |
|
|
| whiskers |
| quote: | Originally posted by Boomer187
eh, and who cares about the first one. |
who cares about anything? we're all gonna die anyway... |
|
|
| DigiNut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Boomer187
the second one is an example of the stroop effect. Thats where you are supposively "automatically processing" the word's meaning so that interferes with tring to name the color of the word. Works pretty much all the time and there has been like 700-800 published articles on it. |
Nah, what you're talking about is true but it's not in any way related to the thing he posted. :p |
|
|
| drizzt81 |
| quote: | Originally posted by whiskers
who cares about anything? we're all gonna die anyway... |
*fap fap fap*
I am off to bed lads.. time to bike home :/ |
|
|
| Boomer187 |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Nah, what you're talking about is true but it's not in any way related to the thing he posted. :p |
ACtually I would think it would have something to do with it since the color named in each sentence is different than the color of the sentence. You initially think that the actual blue sentence is red so it is false and the real red sentence is thought to be blue so it is assumed true, yet a second later you figure out that what you thought was red is actually blue and what was thought to be blue is actually red which totally contradicts prior thinking.....
lmao, man I suck at repling. bottom line is that the stroop effect adds to the confusion of the already confusing sentence. |
|
|
| 'mju:zik |
| quote: | Originally posted by Boomer187
ACtually I would think it would have something to do with it since the color named in each sentence is different than the color of the sentence. You initially think that the actual blue sentence is red so it is false and the real red sentence is thought to be blue so it is assumed true, yet a second later you figure out that what you thought was red is actually blue and what was thought to be blue is actually red which totally contradicts prior thinking.....
lmao, man I suck at repling. bottom line is that the stroop effect adds to the confusion of the already confusing sentence. |
digi is actually right...its just bad logic
nothing to do with color |
|
|
| DigiNut |
Well, I suppose the colour could be confusing if you're colourblind. :p
But really it would be the exact same thing if written "The next sentence is false. The previous sentence is true." |
|
|
|
|
