|
String Theory (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| MERTON |
| it's bul!!! there are no strings!!! waht would the strings be made of? all there is at that level IMO is pure energy. movement is time and time is existence. |
|
|
| whiskers |
| quote: | Originally posted by MERTON
it's bul!!! there are no strings!!! waht would the strings be made of? all there is at that level IMO is pure energy. movement is time and time is existence. |
you have any complex equations to back up your theory?
dozens of the smartest string physicists on the planet do. |
|
|
| MERTON |
| equations are . you need measuring tools to prove anything. if you didn't realise that then don't be arguing with me. |
|
|
| whiskers |
| quote: | Originally posted by MERTON
equations are . you need measuring tools to prove anything. if you didn't realise that then don't be arguing with me. |
hah. arguing with you would have the same effect as arguing with a brick wall. go measure us 2 grams of depression with your measuring tools, boy. |
|
|
| loconet |
OHH YAHH!! .. I watched it. The show was one hell of a trip. I missed/didnt catch some parts so I'll probably watch it online...
If anyone is interested they have it up on their website:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html
... and as soon as the website comes backup, I'll post the direct link :D |
|
|
| whiskers |
| quote: | Originally posted by loconet
OHH YAHH!! .. I watched it. The show was one hell of a trip. I missed/didnt catch some parts so I'll probably watch it online...
If anyone is interested they have it up on their website:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html
... and as soon as the website comes backup, I'll post the direct link :D |
ah, it's finally up, nice
but wtf, i only saw an hour of it... and it consisted of several chapters from all 3 parts... wtf... |
|
|
| MERTON |
| quote: | Originally posted by whiskers
hah. arguing with you would have the same effect as arguing with a brick wall. go measure us 2 grams of depression with your measuring tools, boy. |
these "glorious" equatiuons of yours mean nothing without something to back them up. why the hell else would they call it a teory and not a law.. they... AND me.. just might as well be philosophizing. how would you know witout proof? and eqation is not proof of matter. and equation is little different from english. it just helps us understand and to attempt a prediction. an adequate equation cannot be made if we do not know of all the variable.. and obviously since we still have to have "ideas" about what's out there we do not know of all the variable. as i said do not argue with me! |
|
|
| loconet |
| quote: | Originally posted by FunkySimon
So explain to me wath this program is about!
I'm really excited after reading this thread! |
The theory of everything :D
Give your brain a treat, it'll thank you.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html |
|
|
| loconet |
| Did anyone else feel insignificant after watching the show? :(:p |
|
|
| whiskers |
| quote: | Originally posted by MERTON
as i said do not argue with me! |
you haven't made a single valid argument, just random mumbling with bad spelling errors. i wouldn't even want to start arguing because your ego obviously seems to be bigger than the sun itself. random flaming responces is all i can offer.
FunkySimon, IMO you should see this, i'm on the 2nd hour right now and it absolutely rocks, although it seems to be down ATM. i find it interesting how this theory might also combine science with philosophy. einstein's the man, btw. |
|
|
| DrUg_Tit0 |
| quote: | Originally posted by MERTON
these "glorious" equatiuons of yours mean nothing without something to back them up. why the hell else would they call it a teory and not a law.. they... AND me.. just might as well be philosophizing. how would you know witout proof? and eqation is not proof of matter. and equation is little different from english. it just helps us understand and to attempt a prediction. an adequate equation cannot be made if we do not know of all the variable.. and obviously since we still have to have "ideas" about what's out there we do not know of all the variable. as i said do not argue with me! |
A law is defined by equations. Without the equations you have nothing. Equations are what describe the behaviour of the world. But really, you're as thick as a nuclear power plant reactor casing, so there indeed is no reason to argue with you. |
|
|
|
|
