|
American Psycho Movie Question (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DarkAngel |
| quote: | Originally posted by Streakfury
Anyone seen the second one?? Man, that sucks!
:) |
The ONLY good thing about that movie was: Mila Kunis.
 |
|
|
| Roquer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Streakfury
Anyone seen the second one?? Man, that sucks!
:) |
The real sequels are worth checking out.
Rules of attration was the best movie of 2002 IMHO |
|
|
| DJRavemonkey |
| quote: | Originally posted by Patrick Bateman
I'm glad to see that my personal life is of such interest to you all, but to reply to your question yes i did kill all those people and i'd do it again.
P.S I'm not crazy, its everyone else thats crazy. |
hahah thats some funny mate |
|
|
| Danny Ocean |
i think its left as a subject of debate if he committed the murders or not. Personally, i think he did kill Paul Owen (Paul Allen). He did imagine some of the murders but some did actually happen.
I think his lawyer at the end told him he didn't do the murders and it was a joke because he had already taken care of it(attorney-client privilage). They got someone to clean out Paul Owens place and sell it as soon as possible. When Bateman went back into Paul Owens place after the confession, the woman tested him by asking him if he saw the add in the times, Bateman responded he did and she told him there was no add in the times, and she knew he was the one responsible for what had happened there.
Bateman's lawyer denying his confession due to attorney-client privilage and for Batemans own benefit was actually a slap to the face for Bateman, because he wanted to get recognized and caught for the murders.
thats just my theory though, i like it more than "he just imagined it all, it never happened" theory. |
|
|
| bidor |
| quote: | Originally posted by Danny Ocean
i think its left as a subject of debate if he committed the murders or not. Personally, i think he did kill Paul Owen (Paul Allen). He did imagine some of the murders but some did actually happen.
I think his lawyer at the end told him he didn't do the murders and it was a joke because he had already taken care of it(attorney-client privilage). They got someone to clean out Paul Owens place and sell it as soon as possible. When Bateman went back into Paul Owens place after the confession, the woman tested him by asking him if he saw the add in the times, Bateman responded he did and she told him there was no add in the times, and she knew he was the one responsible for what had happened there.
Bateman's lawyer denying his confession due to attorney-client privilage and for Batemans own benefit was actually a slap to the face for Bateman, because he wanted to get recognized and caught for the murders.
thats just my theory though, i like it more than "he just imagined it all, it never happened" theory. |
cmon dude! why bump a thread from 2003? the movies is prehistoric!
didnt you read the warning? |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by bidor
cmon dude! why bump a thread from 2003? the movies is prehistoric!
didnt you read the warning? |
He obviously used the search function and found a topic about American Psycho when he felt like talking about it. Perfectly valid bump if you ask me.
My impression of the movie was the same, Danny. I don't think the primary point of the movie was whether or not he committed the murders or not though. The fact that the reality of such deplorable acts could be ambiguous to one with so much prestige and potential was what was supposed to be the most disturbing aspect. And at the end he claims he has lost all value for human life - that's one of the most interesting mindsets that many serial killers seem to take. |
|
|
| bidor |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
He obviously used the search function and found a topic about American Psycho when he felt like talking about it. Perfectly valid bump if you ask me.
My impression of the movie was the same, Danny. I don't think the primary point of the movie was whether or not he committed the murders or not though. The fact that the reality of such deplorable acts could be ambiguous to one with so much prestige and potential was what was supposed to be the most disturbing aspect. And at the end he claims he has lost all value for human life - that's one of the most interesting mindsets that many serial killers seem to take. |
ok i apologise:) |
|
|
| Danny Ocean |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
My impression of the movie was the same, Danny. I don't think the primary point of the movie was whether or not he committed the murders or not though. The fact that the reality of such deplorable acts could be ambiguous to one with so much prestige and potential was what was supposed to be the most disturbing aspect. And at the end he claims he has lost all value for human life - that's one of the most interesting mindsets that many serial killers seem to take. |
I agree, however you have to remember that all prestige and potencial becomes irrelevant to someone who is "utterly insane". He lost all value for human life because pretty much everyone around him were shallow, with the exception of Jean (his secretary), whom he probably spared because he actually valued her life.
Im glad we both agree to the same analysis on the reality of the murders.
| quote: | Originally posted by Orbax
They WERE cran-apple stains. and that can be expounded to the entire movie. |
Oh they were? the scene before the laundry is Pat standing next to this dark haired woman in the street, and they make some eye contact as they wait for the "Walk" light. Then he's at the launders with his red stained sheets. It was probably blood, and it was probably the dark haired woman's blood.
Bidor, you are forgiven. |
|
|
| bidor |
| quote: | Originally posted by Danny Ocean
Bidor, you are forgiven. |
thank you sir. |
|
|
| Groundhog Boy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Danny Ocean
i think its left as a subject of debate if he committed the murders or not. Personally, i think he did kill Paul Owen (Paul Allen). He did imagine some of the murders but some did actually happen.
I think his lawyer at the end told him he didn't do the murders and it was a joke because he had already taken care of it(attorney-client privilage). They got someone to clean out Paul Owens place and sell it as soon as possible. When Bateman went back into Paul Owens place after the confession, the woman tested him by asking him if he saw the add in the times, Bateman responded he did and she told him there was no add in the times, and she knew he was the one responsible for what had happened there.
Bateman's lawyer denying his confession due to attorney-client privilage and for Batemans own benefit was actually a slap to the face for Bateman, because he wanted to get recognized and caught for the murders.
thats just my theory though, i like it more than "he just imagined it all, it never happened" theory. |
I agreed with some of this an almost identical thread last month (which confused the hell out of me because i was looking for my post in this thread :))- http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...threadid=340848 |
|
|
| UWM |
| "Would you shut the up? We're trying to do drugs over here." |
|
|
| DJ RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by UWM
"Would you shut the up? We're trying to do drugs over here." |
I'll see that and raise you a:
"They don't have a good bathroom to do coke in!" |
|
|
|
|
