|
The most dangerous country to world peace (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| UglyDave |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Frankly, I'm a little insulted. |
get over it dude |
|
|
| dj_ilan_yosef |
| Where is Syria, Iran, the Saudis, the French? Come on... give us the real options... But i vote for Israel as the biggest threat to the world... those filthy jews just wanna take over the world. its time we critisize them to try and make them disappear! Terrorism and murder against Israelis isn't enough, we must discredit them in every way shape and form to get rid of them once and forall... the final solution! I'll see you if we ever get there! |
|
|
| TranceGiant |
agree with diginut...pathetic choices
oh well, i voted for pakistan. |
|
|
| NYCTrancefan |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vesa
Me, too. Pakistan's future leadership is an unknown, which is bad because they have nukes and a dispute with India. |
Interesting Vesa never thought about that for some reason, guess I took it for granted about Pervez Musharaf in power, when you consider that twice in recent weeks he has been targeted for assassination it is truly scary. Not to mention the Pakistani scientists that have been dishing out the goods on making your own nuke to all interested buyers. I was India I would be very concerned as to who would replace Musharaf should he be out of power in any scenario in the future. |
|
|
| smokeape |
North Korea - they will eventually force Japan and South Korea to go nuclear in kind.
{{{smoke}}} |
|
|
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by smokeape
North Korea - they will eventually force Japan and South Korea to go nuclear in kind.
{{{smoke}}} |
Funny you should mention that ...
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/a...a.us/index.html
They're not pretending to not have it like everyone else. They have it, they don't care, and they're willing to make threats with it to get what they want.
Nice to see how everyone's threat perception are prioritized :rolleyes:
/korea got my vote. |
|
|
| anuneventrade |
| quote: | Originally posted by occrider
Come now, that's not fair. They set up a whole slew of safe haven zones where the Serbs could convenientally slaughter massed refugees. That's doing something right? |
The situation isn't funny, but the way you worded it, is! :stongue:
I agree that this poll is bull. Who the hell voted for Russia? :conf: |
|
|
| failsafe |
| the russians aren't exactly an icon of stability out there. they didn't get my vote, but they aren't exactly switzerland. |
|
|
| DaveSaenz |
| quote: | Originally posted by borron
What is the country most destabilizing to world peace nowadays? |
By this definition, your choices of countries to vote for are quite incomplete to say the least.
| quote: |
-Note that world peace doesn't necessarily mean it can cause a worldwide war, what i meant is what country can most easily cause a war, even if regional. |
By this definition, I can see how so many would vote the US considering Richard Perle's new book, and the fact that he and people like him have Bush’s ear.
| quote: | Originally posted by Vesa
Me, too. Pakistan's future leadership is an unknown, which is bad because they have nukes and a dispute with India. |
I was the first person to vote for Pakistan. To put it simply, the idea of Taliban or extreme Islamist types being in control of nukes scares the out of me. It also more or less makes the concept of “nuclear deterrence," where two opposing sides obtain nukes in order to “equalize” the threat, seem like the practice of building the foundation of a house upon quicksand. North Korea would be second in my book.
| quote: | Originally posted by failsafe
the russians aren't exactly an icon of stability out there. they didn't get my vote, but they aren't exactly switzerland. |
It seems to me that Putin has been taking Russia slowly back down the path of authoritariansim. |
|
|
| failsafe |
| yah putin clearly isn't the most forward thinking guy in russia. though he's definately better than some of the others. |
|
|
| eLe_vatE |
| haha The European Union has 5 votes, the EU won't do anything to anyone, it might aswell be their moto, you'd have to nuke Brussels before they (collectively) did anything about it, even then France would probably object if they had an arms deal with the nation(s) in question heh. |
|
|
| St_Andrew |
| quote: | Originally posted by eLe_vatE
haha The European Union has 5 votes, the EU won't do anything to anyone, it might aswell be their moto, you'd have to nuke Brussels before they (collectively) did anything about it, even then France would probably object if they had an arms deal with the nation(s) in question heh. |
lol too true |
|
|
|
|
