return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Archives > Classic old threads / Inactive Forums > Retired Forums > Gaming Forum

Pages: [1] 2 
Battlefield or Call of Duty
View this Thread in Original format
djSlain
war?

Battlfield is pretty fun, especially DC. However, it runs very poorly on my system with the GeForce 4 MX 440. It's fun, but my experience might be ruined with the performance. i love multiplayer btw.
Call of Duty is INTENSE, as a single player game. I haven't heard anything about multiplayer and i hear it's short. it also runs very smoothly on my comp. might be a great gaming experience.

i don't think i should wait for BF:Vietnam 'cus i think it would run like on this system
Matt Jay
quote:
Originally posted by djSlain
war?

Battlfield is pretty fun, especially DC. However, it runs very poorly on my system with the GeForce 4 MX 440. It's fun, but my experience might be ruined with the performance. i love multiplayer btw.
Call of Duty is INTENSE, as a single player game. I haven't heard anything about multiplayer and i hear it's short. it also runs very smoothly on my comp. might be a great gaming experience.

i don't think i should wait for BF:Vietnam 'cus i think it would run like on this system



Theres nothing like playing CoD on server with 40 other ppl in Team Deathmatch. :eyespop:

It's quite hard to camp as someone will always kill you from behind :P

Single player is short but very intense.
ThaDevil
Battlefield 1942 is not in the same league as Call Of Duty.
rizen
BF1942 atm for me :)
smoorhs
I say CoD MP for sure! :D
Hard_NRG
tough choice but COD gets my vote
ga11agher
call of duty - hands down
nrjizer
CoD > regular BF

however EoD > CoD imo, because the maps are so large and well done, its a lot of fun sneaking through the bushes and popping someone off.
TeKnoHe@d2025
BF doesn't run well on your PC but CoD does...I find that odd. They both run fine here, but CoD is definitely the more graphic intensive of the two.
nrjizer
quote:
Originally posted by TeKnoHe@d2025
BF doesn't run well on your PC but CoD does...I find that odd. They both run fine here, but CoD is definitely the more graphic intensive of the two.


Becuase CoD is Quake3 Engine, and Carmack can program anything :D

alanzo
Call of Duty is lots of fun but is to damn short.. I beat the game in a day.. it took all day, but it was still a day :D
MoonMan
Desert Combat gets my vote, just seeing newbies jump in to helis cracks me up :p
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: [1] 2 
Privacy Statement