|
Why I Love My JP-8080... (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Etherium |
| quote: | | Moog endorses the cs80 just like BT endorses m-audio products. |
Haha, so true. |
|
|
| xternal |
i really like the sounds you got out of this Rb2k1 !
btw i'm planning to get a JP 8080 in the next few months :D |
|
|
| Damie Mckeown |
Sorry you feel like that trancenrg69, doesnt look like anything I say is gonna make you give me a second chance.
Anyway Ive grown up since then (just a little), and Ive started answering more questions than asking them.
So dont anyone be put off me, Im a good guy.
Oh, and do you still want 50% of anything I mmake from that Brilliant Darkness melody?
Because the track Im working on is a Vocal trance track for college, using the midi you didnt want.
If I get far with it, i owe you.
------
Anyway rb2k1, I own a jp8080 too, as your know. But I heard Its 'digital analouge', which is basicly like a VST:conf:
Im sure I have this wrong, kinda but I am confused. |
|
|
| dj-sean |
I agree with trance-nrg for the most part, but he's not really taking into account VSTs like Atmosphere and Trilogy which sample the quality hardware itself and add a lot of flexibility. Yes, they will never beat the real things and never offer the same flexibility, however 90% of the time you will not need the real synth when you have a product like that.
Hardware is better than any VST, but that doesn't mean you should run off and buy a ton of it. Amazing sounds are still achievable with software, just not as easily. That said though I'll probably be buying a Virus when I start working this summer, hehe. |
|
|
| extalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by trancenrg69
Dsp chips will become more advanced just a pc will become more powerful. Point is computers are not built to run just audio programs, thet are designed to run a enormous amount of different applications, where as hardware components are specifically designed to run that piece of hardware. |
actually if one knows about dsp (digital signal processing) he or she would realize that it means digitally processing a signal.. now if one also knows about computers then one might realize that whether you do the digital processing on a dedicated dsp chip or do the processing on your computer's cpu make's no difference as to the sound quality. The issue here is bandwidth and latency. Computer processors are ridiculously faster than any chip inside of a hardware synth, and if you have a fast computer that is set up right, and the software is efficient (think optomized) then it can run the operating system plus whatever digital signal processing you may need to get a good sound like that of some recent hardware synth like the 8080... Of course you can't use an analog circuit in your digital synthesizer unless you convert the signal from digital to analog and then run it through whatever analog circuit you may want to run it through (not that most hardware synths nowadays even use analog effects... much less analog oscillators), but how is that different from outputting the sound from a synthesizer from your 'computer' into an analog effect and then recording it back in? im not sure, but i think most recent hardware synths probably have digital effects, not analog ones...
another thing to think about is that vst's are designed to use only a fraction of your computer's processing power so you can run more than one instrument at a time. If a developer wanted to design a vst that would use a very large amount of processing power (while also being programmed well and efficiently) they could put more bells and whistles on it than you could shake a stickat, and make the sound so amazing that it would rival any "hardware" synth. As computers get faster i predict you will see both hardware and software audio improve greatly, because most hardware uses digital chips that benefit from the same technological advances that 'regular' computers benefit from. |
|
|
| foranAngel4553 |
Oh yeah a tutorial ! :D
sound amazing!! |
|
|
| serp |
| nice link rb2k1 one thing i must say about your site althought the design looks nice the dark red text is almost impossible for me to see on my monitor! (yes i have a monitor) |
|
|
| mantisnl |
| sounds nice mate;) |
|
|
| RiCo |
| Sounds very nice. Like the guy said, the melody itself is cheesy but I'm pretty sure you just threw it there quick to show the sound that you made...very beautiful. Reminds me of my Nova. I'll upload later a sample of a patch that I made with it last year using saw waveforms, two osc, a 12dB low filter, -25 and 25 of detune and unison of 2 with little bit of reverb and plenty of delay. :) |
|
|
| CynepMeH |
| quote: | Originally posted by trancenrg69
Moog endorses the cs80 just like BT endorses m-audio products. Money talks.Arturia models synths from the 60's and 70's. Obviously duplicating a 30 year old synth doesn't require state of the art dsp chips. And if you demoed the new minimoog it isn't even close to the real thing. go try a real minimoog and you'll notice the difference. They can't even emulate 30 year old synths, you think they are gonna come out with a virus vst anytime soon. no way. unless u got a powercore you wont see a virus vst until your first son celebrates his highschool prom. I admit the cs80 is a really nice vst as is the imposcar and minimoog, and they do come close in certain aspects to the real thing, the filters are really nice, but your talking aboout synths that were around before you were even born. Sure i can see maybe in 10 years a virus vst coming ourt, but by then we'll have the virus z and it will make that vst look like a fisger price keyboard.
Your a horrible liar. Do you still make your friends listen to my tunes and tell them you made them? you should hook up with Sirocco, you guys would be best buds. The reaon i blocked you is cause i had my nickname on msn as "the future is trance", and you messaged me and said " my nicknames are annoying, and it pisses you off, and makes you nervous, or some like that. You were a rude little ass jockey, so don't message me here again. Your not only a little weisel but a liar also. You have no idea who your dealing with. this is my final warning to you. shut up and dont bother me again.
sorry for everyone who had to read this, but man some people really need a kick in the ass. |
Starting with February (I think) issue, FM (future music) magazine has a series of write-ups on Hardware VS Software. The Moog software cam close but didn't win, but FM-7 (NI) did - even Brian Eno said that aside from maybe a few particluar quirks that the instrument has, he could not tell the difference between real yamaha and VSTi. VSTis have come a long way. With advance of controllers like MicroKorg and Novation 25 you'll soon see VSTis place HW out of business. That's why companies like Novation are getting into the sw market and getting out of the HW market. Hell, roland tried it with their VariOS (which many claim is a $1000 dongle). ONce manufacturers of soft vst'is will figure out to secure their products, it's buh-bye hardware. You'll probably see just hard-core companies stick around, like Access, Waldorf, Oberheim, Roland, and Korg, Clavia. The rest will go the way of dodo. Give it maybe 4-5 years (or less).
:rolleyes:
P.S. Virus already has a VSTi (well, TDM) - Virus TDM that sounds like the real thing but soft-based. Clavia has soft version of Nord, Novation has soft version of Bass Station, etc. |
|
|
| Trefall |
| Damn, I need to dust off my old JP8080 and get it hooked to my workstation again... been too long :P nearly forgot I had it. |
|
|
|
|
