|
YART (yet another relationship thread) (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Lira |
Question #1: Do you guys live in the same city?
Question #2: Do you fancy her that much already?
Question #3: Do you use photoshop 7 or 6?
By the way, do edit Whiskers pics :) And do sent the letter, what have you got to lose? |
|
|
| DjDeComp |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kamikaze Badger
Dude, you did the wrong thing. You embarressed her. And you've only known her for 2 weeks. I've known my beloved for over 6 months, and I would NEVER do anything like that. Try to appologize to her as best as you can, and if she dosn't, beg, kiss, huggle, etc. You fscked this up yourself man. |
I so agree with this man right here
:rolleyes: |
|
|
| Boomer187 |
I wrote a lettar, maybe you guys should proof read it before I email it to her. I dont' want to mess up more.
OMGHi2U,
I know we are kinda separated but I have been thinking about those pictars I posted. They were celebrating your good looks and nice butt. We have talked endlessly for a half hour about how I like j00 a lot.
I know mapquest says we are Total Est. Time: 37 hours, 54 minutes Total Est. Distance: 2387.62 miles apart, but in my mind we are Total Est. Time: 0 hours, 0 minutes Total Est. Distance: 0.00000001 miles apart, and you know this.
I wrote a poem for you cause I was so sad, but stupid word crashed and deleted it. So I googled for one and here it is…
Dark still. Twelve degrees below freezing.
Tremor along
the elegant, injured right front
leg of the gelding on the cross-ties. Kneeling
girl.
The undersong of waters as she bathes
the leg in yet more cold. [tongue is broken]
[god to me]
Her hair the color of winter wheat.
That’s straight from the authors heart, to my computer heart, over to yours. You know I’ll be faithful, you can scan my hard drive anytime, there will be no pr0n. swear, totally clean. I mean yeah I dabbled in that before, but I am sure you have some too.
My friend said this letter should take up more space so I will put a report I did on the RIAA a few years ago in here….
The Record Industry Association of America (R.I.A.A.) has been fighting fiercely lately in the battle over copyright infringement over the internet. Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s (DMCA) expedited subpoena provision, the R.I.A.A can now send out subpoenas to Internet Service Providers (I.S.P.) and they must give out information on the user in question. In July the R.I.A.A flooded the court system with close to a thousand such subpoenas. These users, which range from 13 year old children to 65 year old grandparents, can face 3 years in prison and $250,000 in fines. The R.I.A.A also said recently that they will be suing these users to send a message to others. This seems to be the wrong direction the fight against online piracy should take.
The dilemma over downloading music from the internet began to gain steam around four years ago when the program Napster was in its prime. Napster is a program that users download and connect to. Once connected, the user can search through and download the music files of everyone connected. Napster caught on at colleges and universities everywhere, and soon internet usage at these institutions raised as high as 30 times that before the program was invented. This is when the R.I.A.A got involved and sued Napster. After much reform, Napster, when it opens again, is going to be legit. As expected, however, there were countless programs following in the footsteps of Napster.
The turn for the worst in this growing fight started when a court found that services like Napster are legal, it is the users that are doing the illegal activities. Since this decision, the R.I.A.A has been tirelessly pursuing anyone and everyone they can. Instead of exercising other options of downloading and sharing music, the R.I.A.A chose to incriminate those who share music. One example of their unfair lawsuits happened back in April when they sued 19 year old college freshman Jesse Jordan. Luckily, Mr. Jordan settled out of court for $12,000. That seems like an outrageous amount of money to be taking from a 19 year old. I would think that the $12,000 would be better used for a different, more R.I.A.A friendly solution to sharing music online.
One such solution to the problem is to pay a small fee to download each song. iTunes is one such system implemented by Apple. They charge $.99 for each song downloaded. This is defiantly a step in the right direction as it does not place criminal charges on anyone, does not fine anyone incredible amounts of money, and it still supports the rights of the artists being downloaded. Another plus side to this is that the downloader knows exactly what they are downloading. There have been many encrypted viruses spread throughout the networks of Kazaa (Kazaa is a similar program to Napster). A user of Kazaa can never know the true quality of the song they are downloading, but with iTunes the user will always know the specifications of each song. This alternative solution to the so called problem of online music sharing was never exercised by the R.I.A.A.
While it is important to have consequences to breaking the law, a viable option should be made available. Previous law suits against music sharing companies has only spawned better ways of sharing music and more resentment towards the R.I.A.A. Many people have even grown distaste for certain artists (e.g. Metallica, The Dixie Chicks, and Missy Elliot) as a result of this fight against piracy. All of the lawsuits and hatred prove to me that this fight against copyright infringement is not going in the right direction. Instead of wasting money on litigations, more money should be invested in a compromise between people who share music and the R.I.A.A.
Baby, take me back.
Booom booooom boomers. |
|
|
| Omegasox |
| Ejaculate onto your webcam to show her how much you care. Or photoshop her pic with her hand cupped around your balls, that always hits the soft spot. |
|
|
| Boomer187 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Question #1: Do you guys live in the same city?
Question #2: Do you fancy her that much already?
Question #3: Do you use photoshop 7 or 6?
By the way, do edit Whiskers pics :) And do sent the letter, what have you got to lose? |
nope
yeap
neither, 8. |
|
|
| Aya Brea |
| quote: | Originally posted by DjDeComp
:nervous: :nervous: :nervous: |
yea...:nervous: |
|
|
| anuneventrade |
Oh Boooom boooom boooomers,
How could I have been so wrong to let you go? Your poetry was beautiful (well, that one guys was), so I googled poetry for you too!
You really ed me Boomers,
You really did a number on me,
I never knew me cheatin' on you would come back to haunt me.
But we was kids then Boomers, I was only 18!
That was years ago, I thought we wiped the slate clean
That's ed up!!
Okay, so maybe it really is irrelevant, but it's the thought that counts, right?
I understand that you photochopped those pictures only because I won't send you nekkid pics over the webcam, but you have to understand, I only did it because I am really a man. Okay, so that's not the real reason either. I just think that we should wait until we've at least gotten until three weeks of our relationship before I start letting you see me nekkid.
Nothing can replace those wonderful nights where we would talk for hours about how it's soda and not pop and how whiskers is really gay but he won't come out of the closet yet. Babe, you had me at OMGHI2U!
So lets share a beer and get on with our intarweb relationship baby.
The nun. |
|
|
| Boomer187 |
| quote: | Originally posted by anuneventrade
Oh Boooom boooom boooomers,
How could I have been so wrong to let you go? Your poetry was beautiful (well, that one guys was), so I googled poetry for you too!
You really ed me Boomers,
You really did a number on me,
I never knew me cheatin' on you would come back to haunt me.
But we was kids then Boomers, I was only 18!
That was years ago, I thought we wiped the slate clean
That's ed up!!
Okay, so maybe it really is irrelevant, but it's the thought that counts, right?
I understand that you photochopped those pictures only because I won't send you nekkid pics over the webcam, but you have to understand, I only did it because I am really a man. Okay, so that's not the real reason either. I just think that we should wait until we've at least gotten until three weeks of our relationship before I start letting you see me nekkid.
Nothing can replace those wonderful nights where we would talk for hours about how it's soda and not pop and how whiskers is really gay but he won't come out of the closet yet. Babe, you had me at OMGHI2U!
So lets share a beer and get on with our intarweb relationship baby.
The nun. |
OMGiCRY,
your amazing, so like, we aren't starting our intarnet relationship over right...we are still at 2 weeks....
cause now i only have one more week to wait 8-) |
|
|
| montie |
OMG you two are so cute you make me cry with joy that you found eachother.
skittles
:p |
|
|
| Trance-Aqua |
So as i understand its two guys on the net, but one is pretending to be a girl??
Ahh am i missing out on a joke ??? Im fieling lost/dumb right now lol |
|
|
| DeviantxPete |
| online relationships :rolleyes: |
|
|
| arctic |
 |
|
|
|
|
