|
What would you recommend!!!
|
View this Thread in Original format
| BIKKEL |
should is better us the fx from t-racks ( compressor/limiter/eq etc.)
Or use vsti effects of other company's.
SO what would you recommend
Thx :) |
|
|
| dbl |
from what i heard it's better to use different pluggins like one for EQ, one for compressor, one for limiter etc... then using just one prog that contains it all like t-racks.
i'm no mastering expert at all, but it's just what i have heard |
|
|
| BIKKEL |
| quote: | Originally posted by dbl
from what i heard it's better to use different pluggins like one for EQ, one for compressor, one for limiter etc... then using just one prog that contains it all like t-racks.
i'm no mastering expert at all, but it's just what i have heard |
Is it also possible to connect the eq of t-racks to a synthesizer of is it only for mastering? |
|
|
| hey cheggy |
From what I understand, T-Racks is a program, not a plugin, so you wouldn't be able to use it as an insert or send for a synth.
As for results, while there are definitely better plugins than what you would get in t-racks, there are also crappier plugins. The benefit of using plugins though is that they can be used for more than just mastering. Compressors and eq have more than one use. |
|
|
| Etherium |
| quote: | | From what I understand, T-Racks is a program, not a plugin, so you wouldn't be able to use it as an insert or send for a synth. |
I think it's a VSTi now as well. |
|
|
| Vizay |
use separate plugins instead of T-racks, the soundquality that T-racks generate isn't anywhere near good unfortunatley...
another problem with it when it comes to mastering is that you don't have 100% controll over the chain if I'm not totally wrong :) |
|
|
|
|
