|
Groundrules? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Fractal |
| quote: | Originally posted by Luke Terry
tbh there is too much of here is a sample of my new amazing tune or a full rip at 8kpbs... |
Heh...I feel concerned here:)
Well,I don't think the full lo-fi versions should be totaly forbidden.
That's clear,I'll never post the full version at 96kbps. But when I post my new tune here,I usually put 128 or 192 preview PLUS full lo-fi rip (40 or 56 but never 8kbps!). So people can enjoy the full track at least in low quality.But the hi-fi sample still always avalable. So I think it's better to have BOTH: a hi-fi sample + full lo-fi.
So... my position is: the full lo-fi tracks should be allowed only if a little hi-fi sample is posted aswell. |
|
|
| Luke Terry |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fractal
Heh...I feel concerned here:)
Well,I don't think the full lo-fi versions should be totaly forbidden.
That's clear,I'll never post the full version at 96kbps. But when I post my new tune here,I usually put 128 or 192 preview PLUS full lo-fi rip (40 or 56 but never 8kbps!). So people can enjoy the full track at least in low quality.But the hi-fi sample still always avalable. So I think it's better to have BOTH: a hi-fi sample + full lo-fi.
So... my position is: the full lo-fi tracks should be allowed only if a little hi-fi sample is posted aswell. |
you are a prime example of what should happen on this forum :)
+ 8kpbs was an exaggeration :p |
|
|
| Fundamental |
| Sounds like a good idea. It's the reason I've been posting less in here recently. |
|
|
| Spin Doctor |
While I understand it would be nice for people to have decent quality rips, please remember that not everyone had masses of space to up them to!
:whip: |
|
|
| Luke Terry |
| quote: | Originally posted by Spin Doctor
While I understand it would be nice for people to have decent quality rips, please remember that not everyone had masses of space to up them to!
:whip: |
soundclick is the answer :p |
|
|
| Haak |
| quote: | Originally posted by Luke Terry
+ 8kpbs was an exaggeration :p |
been there done that :p |
|
|
| Drazzic |
| I normally put samples online @ 128kpbs, most peoples can listen cleary to it. Is that a problem? I think 128kpbs is quality enough. |
|
|
| George Kendall |
great idea
no label really gives a if theres a 192 or over SAMPLE on the internet...or if theres a 96kbps full version..
people are being tooo picky |
|
|
| tu_face |
| quote: | Originally posted by George Kendall
great idea
no label really gives a if theres a 192 or over SAMPLE on the internet...or if theres a 96kbps full version..
people are being tooo picky |
i agree..
so long as the full track isnt available in good high quality then no label will give a .
there is no point what so ever in posting a lo quality sample, nobody can give decent feedback on mastering, production techniques etc, not to mention lo-fi often s up the mid + high ranges totally.. |
|
|
| TOR |
| quote: | Originally posted by Haak
been there done that :p |
evil bastard :stongue: |
|
|
| BelgianGuru |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fractal
Heh...I feel concerned here:)
Well,I don't think the full lo-fi versions should be totaly forbidden.
That's clear,I'll never post the full version at 96kbps. But when I post my new tune here,I usually put 128 or 192 preview PLUS full lo-fi rip (40 or 56 but never 8kbps!). So people can enjoy the full track at least in low quality.But the hi-fi sample still always avalable. So I think it's better to have BOTH: a hi-fi sample + full lo-fi.
So... my position is: the full lo-fi tracks should be allowed only if a little hi-fi sample is posted aswell. |
I feel the same way as him. I think that some people here still post samples at low quality of tracks they made that they are still sending out to labels etc.. and that they like. So they won't post it at high quality. And also this would mean we would only hear the rejected demos from these people. |
|
|
| Spin Doctor |
| quote: | Originally posted by Luke Terry
soundclick is the answer :p |
I shall have to investigate. |
|
|
|
|
