|
Audiogalaxy or WinMX? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| arno |
winmx takes ages to connect.
winmx doesn't find shi@t
winmx is slow as hell.
audiogalaxy rocks! |
|
|
| Abbas |
| i have to say AG....many gigabytes d/led from there :D |
|
|
| x-dream |
| I prefer Ag.....Itīs better..... |
|
|
| Sugarbean |
audio galaxy is way better imo...
when my puter crashed...i came to dl the satelite again..and at that time it wasnt workin properly so i got winmx....thank goodness ag started workin again cuz damn...i deleted that crap lol |
|
|
| dj marmota |
Yeah, I support those ones that prefer AG. I use it when sleeping so I don't have to be taking care of the connections in WinMX, and also there are more songs on AG than on WinMX.
Having said that, what I don't like about AG is the time I spend looking for a long version of a song. On WinMX I can instantly see the minutes of a song, I only download full versions and it's really quick which one to choose. On AG I have to do 2 or 3 clicks which take a long time to receive answer, at least on my computer. |
|
|
| ripcurl |
Ag all the way baby!
but there are rumors about paying and that makes me sad:eek: |
|
|
| tru-Mac |
| Audio Galaxy, most definately......why? AG has all the trance i want...Winmx has some nice porno clips but the servers are always busy |
|
|
| Blik |
| AG for sure, just way better then WinMX |
|
|
| j_spot |
| ok..Ive tried AG now..cuz winMX is starting to really suck, and I like..AG is better by far |
|
|
| hypronix |
I use WinMX
but then I am better withou any of them, cause at my supe-duper fast-computer DLs are not an issue... think about that beautiful 33.6K...yeah, that's me! |
|
|
| Juricimo |
after napster went down, WInMX seemed to do the same for me....
audiogalaxy, so far works well for me
>JM< |
|
|
| hypronix |
| what do you think about Kazaa? many of my friends started using this one instead of the rest... |
|
|
|
|
