return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Album Reviews / New Releases Discussion

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 
George Acosta presents The History of Trance 1993 - 2004 (pg. 3)
View this Thread in Original format
YaleTrance
quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
it's one of those tracks you wish would go down in history to stop you being reminded of how gash it is


and I'm with ste, this has nearly all to do with 1993-1997 bar a couple of tracks, this guy seems to be the hybrid of judge jules, dave pearce and atb.... and a bit of a wanker to boot, speaking of which, anyone sees him, please do so :p


I would if he weren't so fat.

:haha: :haha:
starglider
For the record, Jon Secada – “Just Another Day is from 1992, but it's not exactly trance and I've no clue what Acosta's own remix sounds like.
YaleTrance
quote:
Originally posted by starglider
For the record, Jon Secada – “Just Another Day is from 1992, but it's not exactly trance and I've no clue what Acosta's own remix sounds like.


Latin pop. I don't think that counts man. And even if George did the remix back then it doesn't belong in a History of Trance CD.
raditz
The sad thing is that people out there that know nada about trance might just buy it because of the name. A friend of mine just mentioned it to me asking if he should buy it, I obviously told him HELL NO, but that just shows how easy is to attrack people with such 'fancy names' ... marketing can be so pathetic. :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip:
Gordy
just curious what the hell is weight has to do with anything?!
Gordy
just curious what the hell is weight has to do with anything?!
mike_stefan69
what i want to know is what the point of this compilation was.
if you want a trance "classics" CD go and buy tranceport - at least that CD came out at the time and not 5 years trying to milk some overplayed tunes to the last drop...

anyone who has listened to trance properly for a number of years knows how difficult it would be to bring out a CD trying to represent "the history of trance". you could easily do a CD for every year from 1993-2004 - thats over 120 tracks at least. try and fit this into a double (or even triple) compilation CD and you end up with either:
1. all the tracks everyone knows. it adds nothing to an already saturated market
2. if you try and be original and put some great yet little known classics no one will buy it (except maybe a small minority of very well informed listeners)

if you are the company you obviously want to make as much money as possible which is why everyone goes for option 1

this is just another deplorable attempt to cash in on classic tracks and should be treated with the contempt it deserves
NPursuit
quote:
Originally posted by YaleTrance
Latin pop. I don't think that counts man. And even if George did the remix back then it doesn't belong in a History of Trance CD.


On the CD it's listed as 2004 since he produced this remix in 2004. I guess that is why it's on there. Personally I think it's the worst track on the CD.
NPursuit
quote:
Originally posted by Gordy
just curious what the hell is weight has to do with anything?!


That and he is about half that size now. I guess if I were gay I would be concerned with what he looked like.
YaleTrance
quote:
Originally posted by Gordy
just curious what the hell is weight has to do with anything?!


Learn to read. It was a sarcastic reply to this:

quote:
and a bit of a wanker to boot, speaking of which, anyone sees him, please do so

lücid
i wonder whose idea it was to make the color scheme of the CD packaging white and hot pink?!
refuge.01^
That has to be one of the funniest smilies I have ever seen! Where did you get it from?
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 
Privacy Statement