|
Originals or Remixes?
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Floorfiller |
ok so on a vinyl...
lets say you could only have 2 tracks...would you rather have
2 original artist songs
or
1 original tune and a remix of that tune
or
would you rather have two seprate releases one with 2 originals and the other with 2 remixes |
|
|
| Stuku |
| floorfiller stop making stupid polls :toothless |
|
|
| Thunder5 |
1 Original work and 1 Remix of that work
Or
floorfiller stop making stupid polls
Having hard time choosing between those two... :) |
|
|
| Spin Doctor |
| I’d rather have four tunes on the one disc. :mad: |
|
|
| Thunder5 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Spin Doctor
I’d rather have four tunes on the one disc. :mad: |
Now that would be a overkill.. :) |
|
|
| Floorfiller |
| quote: | Originally posted by Spin Doctor
I’d rather have four tunes on the one disc. :mad: |
yeah i suppose i could do that...i just want the quality to be the best. |
|
|
| XeQtOr |
| 1 original and 1 remix. |
|
|
| TranceMuzik02 |
| floorfiller stop making stupid polls |
|
|
| Floorfiller |
| i just wanted to get a sense of what the consumer wants...is that so wrong :nervous: :p :D |
|
|
| Spin Doctor |
Overkill, why? I’m f****** fed up of paying for a tune twice over because of different mixes. You can generally fit two tunes on one side of a vinyl if they aren’t ridiculously long epics, so why can’t we have one 12” with four tunes, regardless of whether they be other mixes or other productions by the artist? Profit seems to be the answer to that question.
rar, madness! :whip: |
|
|
| Fundamental |
| 1 original & 1 remix please. Second tunes by the same artist on vinyls tend to be pretty poor. |
|
|
| starglider |
| Two original works. Obviously if the b-side is an afterthought or something the producer dug out of the depths of his studio then it's not going to be a quality release, but all the same. |
|
|
|
|
