|
Which did come first...
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Kamikaze Badger |
| The chicken or the egg? Technically, the chicken had to come first... but then how did the egg's get bred? Because a hen and a rooster would have to have sex for the egg to be bred... |
|
|
| torontotrance |
| it's confirmed, you are an attention whore, you join such ta's as the following (tiesto14, whiskers and trancEyes22), congrats. |
|
|
| TweeK |
| I think god made the Chicken first.....than the egg |
|
|
| torontotrance |
| Anyway, the Chicken came first in my opinion because I go by the creationist view of the world, so the Chicken came first. |
|
|
| enferno |
chickens evolved from something over millions of generations
so techincally, neither |
|
|
| darkace |
| A chicken and an egg are lying in bed, smoking a cigarette; clothes lying on the floor, sheets tangled, panting heavily. "well," says the chicken, "I guess that answers THAT question..." |
|
|
| Kamikaze Badger |
| I'm not an attention whore, I've just had too much pop. |
|
|
| Vigilante |
I agree that the chicken would have gradually evolved over time, so technically the chicken came first.
However, when you think about it, all chickens hatch from eggs, so the first chicken would have had to come from from an egg.
Quite the conundrum. |
|
|
| Prodigy Child |
| Who gives a what came first, just aslong as theres eggs to make a good poched egg when I got the munchies. |
|
|
| enferno |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vigilante
I agree that the chicken would have gradually evolved over time, so technically the chicken came first.
However, when you think about it, all chickens hatch from eggs, so the first chicken would have had to come from from an egg.
Quite the conundrum. |
technically, if you follow down the evolutionary line far enough, you will find like, the first single celled organisim in existance . . therefore, since the random formation of molecules that created life, technically can be called a chicken, came first. |
|
|
| Solstice |
| quote: | Originally posted by torontotrance
it's confirmed, you are an attention whore, you join such ta's as the following (tiesto14, whiskers and trancEyes22), congrats. |
hahahaha nice call |
|
|
| Kamikaze Badger |
Now, for the next question:
Would a set of all sets contain itself? |
|
|
|
|
