|
Non EDM - Red Hot Chilli Peppers vs Oasis (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Coup |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Oasis don't do anything original at all. |
what a load of absolute bollocks. Wonderwall has become a total classic, u dont get classics if theyre not original. |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by Coup
what a load of absolute bollocks. Wonderwall has become a total classic, u dont get classics if theyre not original. |
A totally classic pop song... don't be such a fanboy. Wonderwall is catchy and your mum likes it, that's why it sold so many, and that's why it's a classic. Nothing more, nothing less. |
|
|
| zshev |
| gotta be the Chili's |
|
|
| Coup |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
A totally classic pop song... don't be such a fanboy. Wonderwall is catchy and your mum likes it, that's why it sold so many, and that's why it's a classic. Nothing more, nothing less. |
i dissagree. thats all i can be arsed to write. |
|
|
| lachieslats |
Oasis are original, its just that many people only hear their tracks that make it onto radio, wonderwall is a great song, truly original, and just because it got played a load on the radio doesn't mean its bad.
So much RCHP stuff is more pop-esque than Oasis!
Oasis have so much depth and originality in their other stuff that doesn't make it to radio!
Don't judge them based on superficial knowledge, listen to some of their lesser know stuff and then you will see how much better than RHCP they are - just listen to "The Masterplan" album - in terms of originality and just all round brilliance.
I seriously cannot believe Oasis are going to lose this poll. |
|
|
| lachieslats |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
1. Oasis are much more of a mainstream band than RHCP,
Oasis don't do anything original at all. |
I don't think we could be possibly talking about the same band here... |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by lachieslats
I don't think we could be possibly talking about the same band here... |
Look, in the UK, Oasis are a pop band. They had a legendary chart battle with Blur in 1995/1996 to see who could get more number ones. They're Britpop. Pure and simple. RHCP are a rock band, and however popular they are, they aren't a pop band. |
|
|
| lachieslats |
| That's not how it seems in Australia! |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
UK Chart Hits Database
^ Up until the beginning of 2002. Type in Oasis and then Red Hot Chili Peppers and see who gets the most hits. |
|
|
| lachieslats |
| quote: | Originally posted by Tangil
That's not how it seems in Australia! |
Do I live in the UK?
Even if this were the case, Oasis are still a far better group, some pop record bull cant tarnish that fact |
|
|
| Coup |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
UK Chart Hits Database
^ Up until the beginning of 2002. Type in Oasis and then Red Hot Chili Peppers and see who gets the most hits. |
what exactly does this prove? that because oasis had more successful hits than red hot chilli's, that makes them worse than the chilli's?
seems backwards logic there. ur slating them for being popular. maybe theyre popular because theyre good and liked? the only exception i can think to this rule is tiesto. |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| I'm proving they're far more commerical, which was one point I made that everyone disagreed with. RHCP started back in 1984, yet they only even got vaguely close to as commercial as Oasis in 1991. |
|
|
|
|
