|
What do you think of this advice (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Slylee |
| quote: | Originally posted by rabbitjoker
Golden Rule: don't even think about getting your rocks off until she's gotten her rocks off. |
amen |
|
|
| jessicah |
| quote: | Originally posted by davinox
arbiter, watch out, she posted three times.
whenever a poster posts three times, cyber-satan is summoned, ravaging the hills and plains and thoroughly tormenting everything in his path. |
Yeah, it took me SO LONG to write out those three posts. 4 minutes, then his brain synapses weren't firing quickly enough for me so I decided he wasn't worth the time.
Look guys. Anytime you're going to write a post making a broad generalization about women and their reasoning skills (or lack thereof) you're: 1) inexperienced with women, 2) have some sort of vendetta against the female gender, or 3) simply sexist. Or 4) he's just trying to piss me off, which as you can see lasted 4 minutes and was rather pointless.
OBVIOUSLY if you're going to get on here and post that most women don't have any reasoning, then you're simply representing yourself as narrow-minded jackass and I'm going to call you on it. But if you're just trying to piss me off for the sake of pissing me off, what's the point?
Talk about "reasoning" - the "reasoning" that he used to deduce that my "sassiness" (oh what a clever, clever boy!) was the result of insecurity and not confidence in my own intelligence....:rolleyes: Clearly I found his intelligence to be sub-par, and so I've dismissed him.
Anyone else? |
|
|
| Slylee |
if you know inside that you do not fall under that category of women then don't sweat it.
i actually agree....women are dumb (why i have only 1 female friend), and never know what they want...and when they DO know what they want, it's either money, or another pair of shoes:stongue: |
|
|
| nic01445 |
| quote: | Originally posted by jessicah
Yeah, it took me SO LONG to write out those three posts. 4 minutes, then his brain synapses weren't firing quickly enough for me so I decided he wasn't worth the time.
Look guys. Anytime you're going to write a post making a broad generalization about women and their reasoning skills (or lack thereof) you're: 1) inexperienced with women, 2) have some sort of vendetta against the female gender, or 3) simply sexist. Or 4) he's just trying to piss me off, which as you can see lasted 4 minutes and was rather pointless.
OBVIOUSLY if you're going to get on here and post that most women don't have any reasoning, then you're simply representing yourself as narrow-minded jackass and I'm going to call you on it. But if you're just trying to piss me off for the sake of pissing me off, what's the point?
Talk about "reasoning" - the "reasoning" that he used to deduce that my "sassiness" (oh what a clever, clever boy!) was the result of insecurity and not confidence in my own intelligence....:rolleyes: Clearly I found his intelligence to be sub-par, and so I've dismissed him.
Anyone else? |
What's this? A woman trying to make a stand? This isn't "Oxygen," so get back to the kitchen where you belong and make me a sandwich. |
|
|
| DJ_Bod |
EDIT:
Not my fight. Fcuk it |
|
|
| jessicah |
| quote: | Originally posted by nic01445
What's this? A woman trying to make a stand? This isn't "Oxygen," so get back to the kitchen where you belong and make me a sandwich. |
There's something new and original. |
|
|
| jessicah |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ_Bod
EDIT:
Not my fight. Fcuk it |
Now see that's just bull. If you really believe it's not cool to disrespect women, keep your post up. It's just to withdraw it. To use a sexist term. |
|
|
| nic01445 |
| quote: | Originally posted by jessicah
Now see that's just bull. If you really believe it's not cool to disrespect women, keep your post up. It's just to withdraw it. To use a sexist term. |
What a poon. |
|
|
| Slylee |
| quote: | Originally posted by nic01445
What's this? A woman trying to make a stand? This isn't "Oxygen," so get back to the kitchen where you belong and make me a sandwich. |
I can see from your post and your taste in females (see your avatar), that you are still stuck in the caveman days:stongue: |
|
|
| nic01445 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Slylee
I can see from your post and your taste in females (see your avatar), that you are still stuck in the caveman days:stongue: |
Yeah basically :tongue2 |
|
|
| Lira |
Orbax, if you want to keep a girl, you've got to make her feel confident and confortable by your side, not insecure, otherwise you'll be nothing but headache for her (and she'll link you to those feelings of insecurity).
Notice that by "confortable" I mean "not annoying" |
|
|
| Arbiter |
jessicah-
It will never cease to amaze me how some people just keep digging deeper and deeper holes for themselves.
It's one thing to use the "not worth my time" cop-out which is the oldest trick in the book and, sadly, doesn't fool anyone any longer. If you want to try to get out of an argument you know you can't win while trying vainly to save whatever dignity you had to begin with, be my guest. But then to call someone a "" for not jumping on your sinking vessel of an argument after you had moments before ran away with your tail tucked between your legs is just ridiculous.
You can keep telling everyone how confident you are in your intelligence until you're blue in the face, but your actions tell a different story. Slylee hit the nail right on the head: if you were comfortable with your reasoning abilities, you would have simply ignored my generalizations that women rarely use reasoning. But obviously my claims hit a little too close to home, and you couldn't resist giving me a series of obviously emotional responses without anything that could be classified as "reasoning" in them.
Then you challenge me to back up my claim with arguments: but why would I bother when you'd already gone and done the job for me?
Now, you can either be [wo]man enough to admit you were wrong and be done with it, or you can continue to embarass yourself and provide the rest of the forum with some free entertainment. The choice is yours: so why don't you use your "reasoning" to come up with which one is right? |
|
|
|
|
