return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

 
F$ck the Miners, right George?
View this Thread in Original format
MisterOpus1
Ahh, let 'em suffocate. So long as they stay down longer, that's much more important than their health.

Hey, I wonder if their health coverages are increasing, BTW?

quote:
Bush Administration Dismantles Health Protections for Miners

The Bush administration, which has already delayed strong, new health protections for miners, is considering further weakening those standards as it prepares revised rules regulating miners' exposure to underground diesel fumes.

Workers breathe in diesel exhaust from machines used to extract metals and non-metals in the confined spaces of underground mines. Numerous studies show that exposure to such fumes at current levels causes 83 to 800 excess lung cancer deaths per 1,000 workers each year. Other studies show that inhaling diesel particulate matter causes cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary problems. [1]

Under the Clinton administration, the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) developed strict new rules reducing the concentration of diesel particulate matter to which workers could be exposed. When the final rule was issued in 2001, mine operators were given a year and a half to make modest reductions in the amount of diesel exhaust workers were exposed to in their mines. They were given six years to make more substantial reductions.

But the Bush administration extended the deadline for modest reductions by a full year -- an act that was illegal under the Administrative Procedure Act and MSHA's own statute, because the agency failed to hold a public comment period before making the change. [2] Last year, the administration further weakened protections for miners by reopening the rulemaking process and issuing a compliance document that allowed mine operators to all but ignore the tougher diesel standards if they had any difficulty in meeting them. [3]

"It says 'you don't have to ask for an extension, just mention it to the inspector the next time he shows up,'" said Celeste Monforton, senior research associate in the Department of Environmental & Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Health Services at George Washington University, in an interview with BushGreenwatch. "What's the point of having a rule if you can just basically make the rule go away?"

MSHA is in the process of preparing a final rule on the issue, but it's unclear when the rule will be issued or what protections it will contain. "If anything, the rule should be even more stringent," said Monforton.

While the Clinton administration sought to steadily increase MSHA's budget and hire more mine inspectors, President Bush has held spending level or cut spending on mine safety enforcement. Congress, however, has regularly appropriated more than President Bush has requested for the agency.

Notwithstanding the increased appropriations, the Bush administration has done little to strengthen health and safety protections for miners. The few regulations proposed by the administration have mostly weakened those protections.

###

SOURCES:
[1] "Part III: Risk Assessment," Diesel Particulate Matter Exposure of Underground Metal and Nonmetal Miners, Final Rule. Federal Register 66 (13): Jan. 19, 2001.
[2] Federal Mine Safety & Health Act of 1977 (Public Law 91-173), section 101(a)(9).
[3] "Metal and Nonmetal Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) Standard Compliance Guide" (Final Version, August 5, 2003), p. 6.

http://www.bushgreenwatch.org/mt_archives/000160.php
Trancer-X
Well, someone has to pay for those tax cuts, who better than the miners?

It's not like they're a very visible force in todays society, anyway.

I'm joking, of course.
Q5echo
Opus, you should either update your sources or pimp your agenda at MoveOn.org.
14Apr04
http://www.mineweb.net/sections/min...ance/315970.htm

quote:
In an interview with Mineweb, David Lauriski, the assistant secretary of labor who overseas MSHA, contends that the agency has actually improved mining’s health and safety record since President Bush took office. However, MSHA has changed its approach in addressing issues, which has the approval of the National Mining Association, according to Vice President of Safety and Health Bruce Watzman. Nonetheless, this approach may have contributed to the anxiety UMW officials are now feeling about mining health and safety issues.

Main feels that many of the withdrawn proposals are critical to improving conditions for coal, hardrock, and quarry miners. A number of the proposed rules and regulations had been worked on for years before they were tossed out by the Bush appointees.


quote:
Reduction in Accidents and Fatalities “Since we came into this agency in 2001, mining fatalities have dropped by 34%,” according to Lauriski. “All injury rates have dropped by 19% and lost time injury rates by 16%.”

“The agency employees, in particular, have worked extremely hard to get out there and change the trend that we saw in 2001. We were seeing improvements, but they were so, so slow. We needed to see a drastic drop.”

“The Mine Act says that our mission and our mandate are to prevent injury, illness and death in the nation’s mines. We’re all about doing just that. If regulations help us achieve that than those are the regulatory or agenda items that we’re going to pursue,” he said.

UMW’s Main is worried about the black lung disease which still kills 1,000 miners a year in this nation. Efforts to improve the situation through continuous dust monitors took a beating, according to Main. Only the intercession of Congress managed to bring the rule back to life, he added.

“We are currently seeing all-time record lows in over-exposures to silica, to coal dust, to noise-levels,” Lauriski insisted. “The percentage of black lung cases is dropping, but it is not at all acceptable. We have a lot of work to do.”
MisterOpus1
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
Opus, you should either update your sources or pimp your agenda at MoveOn.org.
14Apr04
http://www.mineweb.net/sections/min...ance/315970.htm


Ahh, I stand corrected! Thank you for your source, I completely concede.
occrider
How can you look these poor miners in the eyes and take away their safety benefits?

MisterOpus1
quote:
Originally posted by occrider
How can you look these poor miners in the eyes and take away their safety benefits?



Oh Christ, that one almost made me fall backwards in my chair.

God damnit Occ, you're killing me! I need a ing beer bad......
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
 
Privacy Statement