|
Bush vs. Kerry vs. other (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| albertoR |
| quote: | Originally posted by Azz3D
vote: nader
reason: wants to legalize marijuana |
its the only way people, come on... |
|
|
| {b.s.e.} |
| i see enough american election commercials on canadian television that i don't need to see them in the bloody chillout room. |
|
|
| DJ_Bod |
(ABB)
Anybody But Bush
Reason-
Don't like his foreign policy > domestic policy attitude |
|
|
| DJ-Dank-Poo |
you know after reading over his stand on issues he seems to have a lot of good points.
badnarik proposes good points too.
(of course its all subjective so take that as you will:cool: )
i especially like this one:
"Gun control means being able to hit your target"
and
"nonviolent drug offenders would be released from federal prison, and each state would choose its own drug policy, just as each chose its own alcohol policy when alcohol Prohibition was repealed."
i think i will vote independant for once this election, even though they don't really have a chance. we need someone who isn't afraid to think differently and who isn't afraid to try out new policies. above all, unnecessary war sucks. |
|
|
| tribu |
Vote: Nader
Reasoning: Nader has been fighting for the average American consumer for years. In the coming election, he is not affiliated with any party and thus has not had to modify his personal politics to cater to party leaders. Yes, every candidate will modify their beliefs to garner the most votes possible, but it appears that Nader is the highest profile candidate to be doing that the least in this election. Nader has had his platform avaliable on his website for months; in fact, he has already laid out a proposed budget as well as different spending plans which are based off amounts lower than the current intake of tax dollars. In short, Nader will get my vote as he is the antithesis of the corporate driven candidate. |
|
|
| torontotrance |
| I got a better idea, why can't all the politicians just decide that no matter who wins, they will send Michael Moore to Mars. |
|
|
| tribu |
| quote: | Originally posted by torontotrance
I got a better idea, why can't all the politicians just decide that no matter who wins, they will send Michael Moore to Mars. |
I can go along with that. He went from raising awareness to biased campaigner. And someone should tell him that no one cares about Flint, Michigan but it's residents (and probably only 40% of them). |
|
|
| torontotrance |
| Nah, I'm just tired of the angry filmaking, if he hates Bush that much, why did he show up to the RNC. |
|
|
| tribu |
| quote: | Originally posted by torontotrance
Nah, I'm just tired of the angry filmaking, if he hates Bush that much, why did he show up to the RNC. |
Was he actually part of the RNC? If he was I missed it, though I did note that he took part of the protests held the day before and actually made quite the anti-Bush speech to the masses. If he was inside, I suspect he was just gathering more material for a future "documentary", or maybe just shmoozing with republican politicians for a future hypocritical change of view. They do say that everyone has their price... |
|
|
| torontotrance |
He already soldout, that's obvious
both conventions should have banned him from there, citing his lack of intelligence. |
|
|
|
|
