|
64 = 65
|
View this Thread in Original format
| monoxide |
OLD ...
the same here:
 |
|
|
| Dupz |
wtf???
how does that work?? |
|
|
| stamper |
| quote: | Originally posted by monoxide
OLD ...
the same here:
|
Yes someone please explain?! |
|
|
| Streakfury |
Man that's weird. I even took a snapshot of that 64 = 65 thing, then pasted it in Paint and cut the little pieces out and re-arranged them myself lol!!. It still works. :(
:conf: |
|
|
| kewlness |
draw a straight line across the diagonal for both.
They seem to have different area, but they are actually the same, the triangles are not equivalent size. |
|
|
| snowman99 |
| They arent similair triangles, as kewlness said the slope of the 2 triangles is different ( 0.4 and 0.375 ) ( just count the squares ). Its the same with the 64=65 thing except the drawing is fiddled a bit too, see here http://www.jimloy.com/puzz/missing.htm |
|
|
| kypez |
| quote: | Originally posted by snowman99
They arent similair triangles, as kewlness said the slope of the 2 triangles is different ( 0.4 and 0.375 ) ( just count the squares ). Its the same with the 64=65 thing except the drawing is fiddled a bit too, see here http://www.jimloy.com/puzz/missing.htm |
Its very true. They do have a different slope. I remember seing this along time ago. Tricks many. |
|
|
| stamper |
| quote: | Originally posted by kypez
Its very true. They do have a different slope. I remember seing this along time ago. Tricks many. |
So if i was to recreate this using paper i wouldnt get the same result as the picture?? |
|
|
| FederalBI |
| because they are doing it over the computer in some speed they aren't keeping it accurate so it looks like it feet. |
|
|
|
|
