|
This is truely sad (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Carney |
for one man to get screwed over is nothing for the amount of woman who have.
Dont forget he still has kids to look after...
Plus did he make an effort to get any of his payments change? |
|
|
| rabbitjoker |
My recommendation:
| quote: | Originally posted by rabbitjoker
That is why I had a vasectomy when I was 12. |
|
|
|
| StereoPrincess |
we don't know the whole story of this so i think we should stop speculating.
there is no way that as a man you end up paying your entire paycheck to the women. there are percentages of your earnings that you are expected to pay.
so this guy is obviously a loser and must have ed up royally in terms of getting what he is supposed to get. maybe
and seriously, didn't he learn the first time he got married, what an idiot?!
there are tons of things that you can do to hide your money. the biggest is working under the table. and if it is really bothering him he should move out of the country. don't make a big deal out of it. |
|
|
| jdjd |
| quote: | Originally posted by rabbitjoker
My recommendation: |
It wasn't funny the first time you said it.. |
|
|
| DigiNut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Skipper
There are too many deadbeat dads out there. For every dad who you think gets punished by divorce court, there are 5 that get away paying nothing for their children. |
BULL.
The Liberal media loves to portray divorced men as highly-paid deadbeats who don't care about their kids or their families. But the majority of them are a little similar to the guy in that article - not quite as severe, but close. Most "deadbeat dads" are just ordinary guys like all of the guys in here. And:
- They usually aren't ALLOWED to see their kids, contrary to the pathetic stereotype that they just aren't interested
- They are low to middle-income earners and could barely support the family on a joint income
- They spend every dime they earn to make whatever alimony and support payments they can
- They go further and further into debt due to having no investable income
And those are just the non-paying ones - the majority of divorcees actually do make their payments in full and on time.
The system is completely against divorced dads. I've seen this twice in my own family (though fortunately not in my own household). There are mothers who piss away all the family income, beat the kids, and sit on their asses all day doing nothing, and the court still believes every word they say. I don't need proof - I've seen it with my own eyes.
The saddest part of all of this is that 99% of people who will read this thread STILL don't realize, even after 10 years of this nonsense, that cases like this are not exceptions to the rule anymore. Maybe not all the dads live in shacks, but far too many of them live in squalor and poverty while their ex-wives live the high life. So they're separated from their families, dirt poor, and usually lonely for the rest of their lives because women are either distrustful of them or afraid of becoming financially responsible. Meanwhile their ex-wives remarry and continue to receive support payments even after garnering another income.
I've spoken about this before but in the USA west coast there was a judge who decided to "go tough" on "deadbeat dads" even when it was conclusively proven that (a) they didn't even know the mom, they just had the same or similar name as the actual dad, or (b) they were not the biological father and the mother just named them to get welfare payments. This is how horrible the system has become.
Pre-nups used to be the conclusive answer, but more and more often now the courts ignore them! What an age we live in... |
|
|
| Kytracid |
| quote: | Originally posted by Crazy Serb
That's my contingency plan as well... ;) |
If the bitch wants to leave me...fine, but the kids stay with me, and she ain't seeing a ing dime. Remember the scene from Godfather...yea, that's how i'd play it.
"Leave the house keys on the table, and get the outta my house "
If all else fails...take your kids and bounce. Plenty of places in the world where stupid alimony laws don't exist that up a mans life. |
|
|
| Nemireck |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kytracid
If the bitch wants to leave me...fine, but the kids stay with me,
|
LOL good ing luck pulling that one off! |
|
|
| Kytracid |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nemireck
LOL good ing luck pulling that one off! |
hide a coupla keys of coke in her gym locker, and dime her in to the popo...tell em, she's the neighbourhood crack dealer...what, you mean to say they won't believe a me ? :D
Tell the kids mommy's gone on a long vacation...
hahahaha
there's always plan B -- the shovel, a body bag...oh, mmm...nevermind, i didn't say that. :crazy: :tongue2 :tongue2 :disbelief |
|
|
| Jayx1 |
notice how the women of the board seem to see nothing wrong with the current situation? :rolleyes:
Give me a break about the woman helping the man make his successes. If this is so true then she should be smart enough to either get a paycheque or register her name as part owner. If not, then tough titty. Corperate law is set up for a reason. Imagine if i didn't sign a deal with a business partner but then sued him years later saying i made half the business. The judge would ask for documented proof. Being friends or room mates wouldnt cut it either. Our system for divorce is pathetically backwards. |
|
|
| rabbitjoker |
| quote: | Originally posted by jdjd
It wasn't funny the first time you said it.. |
No, but the look on Jo Momma's face last night sure was... |
|
|
| Kytracid |
| quote: | Originally posted by Jayx1
notice how the women of the board seem to see nothing wrong with the current situation? :rolleyes:
|
They get the house, the car, the kids, the dog, a fat check at the end of the month...if i had i wouldn't be complaining either.
Know your woman guys, and make sure the bitch signs a prenup so you don't get hosed.
Oh, and deadbeat dads...step up and take care of your kids you lazy mothera's ! |
|
|
| Jayx1 |
In related news:
| quote: | . Who Knows Father Best?
Independent Women's Forum, by Rieva Holycross, July 15, 2004
IWF believes that women must accept responsibility for their own actions and that includes getting pregnant and knowing who the father is (pretty onerous responsibility, don’t you think?). California and plenty of other states allow a woman to pretty much name whomever she pleases as the father of her child and sic the state on said dad to collect child support.
Feminist organizations including the National Organization of Women (NOW) has objected to legislation that requires the courts to vacate paternity judgments against men who aren’t, in fact, the father. Think about that. NOW wants some man, any man, to make child support payments. The woman who doesn’t even know who the father is, should not be held responsible for her actions, is a sweet, loving, blameless mother who seeks only to care for her child and if naming some schmuck as father who never saw her before in his life helps her provide for the innocent babe, well then, that’s fine. Innocence is no excuse. Pay up.
In arguing against California’s Paternity Justice Act, NOW claims that its passage would harm children. Harm children? This from the every-baby-deserves-federal-day-care, there’s-no-school-too-bad-for-our-kids crowd?
This is one more item in NOW’s misguided and misbegotten agenda that seeks to exempt women from taking responsibility for their actions and their lives. Their mantra that it’s not your fault; find somebody to blame; find somebody to pay is a horrible model for today’s woman. And, further, in the case of nailing innocent men for child support, it is legalized theft, pure, unalloyed misandry. No wonder the NOW gals liked it so much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
