return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > DJing / Production / Promotion > Music Producers Promotion

Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Mike Foyle presents Luana - Nineteen (Original Mix) (pg. 2)
View this Thread in Original format
MarkzMan_X
-wrong topic-
Mike_Foyle
Full version is now up on my site for free download :)

www.mikefoyle.com

I know its old but i hope you enjoy it!

Mike
Darkness_Hero
The mastering and the build up are superv :D,this is not my style of Trance but sounds excellent ;).
Kopi =o.
Darkness_Hero
quote:
Originally posted by Darkness_Hero
The mastering and the build up are superv :D,this is not my style of Trance but sounds excellent ;).
Kopi =o.

Damn,I forgot to log out the account of my bro,lol...
Mike_Foyle
cheers dude!
RickyM
Sounds really pro Mike, everything is in the right place...it just lacks something memorable in the main melody, it has that 'done before' feel.
Hanki
Nice track Mike, like all of Your productions!!! Keep the good work man!!! :D
Stino
Excellent production man! I think the track lacks a bit of low and lower mid frequencies. Beef them up to give it a bit more body. Other then that this is a great production, climax is AWESOME, very nice sounds and melody. 9 minutes and i liked every second of it. You are to kind to give a 256 kb/s away :D. I think you could get this released if you try...but then again...now we get a full quality version :D.

Stijn
gerrycueto
I think this is signable, even tho you don't think it is anything innovative... not all tracks that get signed are innovative... most aren't.. this is really good.. I'd send this out to get signed. the harmonies are good and you don't hear stuff like that everyday in trance... so I think it is innovative to a degree.
Mike_Foyle
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
it has that 'done before' feel.


thats why im giving it away not trying to sign it hehe

thanks for the kind comments guys, im glad you like it :)

gerrycueto
That has to be the lamest excuse not to sign a track when most tracks have that has been done before...especially in dance music

wtf are these labels on?

"oh no, that track has a 4/4 kick... it's been done before... and a rolling bassline... it's been done again... wtf... openhat on every offbeat... you seriously have no clue how many times that's been done"


Even the number one pop chart tracks have been done before..

point being... just because it has stuff that's been done before is no excuse to not send the track out to labels... To be honest, I'd rather hear a lot of stuff that's been "done before" than a lot of that innovative, pretentious crap out there.
Mike_Foyle
quote:
Originally posted by gerrycueto
That has to be the lamest excuse not to sign a track when most tracks have that has been done before...especially in dance music

wtf are these labels on?

"oh no, that track has a 4/4 kick... it's been done before... and a rolling bassline... it's been done again... wtf... openhat on every offbeat... you seriously have no clue how many times that's been done"


Even the number one pop chart tracks have been done before..

point being... just because it has stuff that's been done before is no excuse to not send the track out to labels... To be honest, I'd rather hear a lot of stuff that's been "done before" than a lot of that innovative, pretentious crap out there.


true, but it doesnt represent my style now, it represents my style about 6 months ago, and i woudlnt really want this track to get released, id rather share it with people like you guys who are prepared to accept it whether or not its inovative and unique :)
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Privacy Statement