|
Size of TA database?
|
View this Thread in Original format
| UglyDave |
Hi folks,
i;ve got a messageboard (phpbb), with about 7500 posts, and it's 5 mb in size..
what size is TA forums database? ..must be friggin huge.... |
|
|
| sEpH |
204,132 threads in total | 3,429,607 posts in total
2300 MB
(i suck in math) |
|
|
| chavs |
| It's big enough to screw the search function. |
|
|
| jonze234 |
| the web monstah posted it a couple weeks ago under a thread about computer specs. if the search function comes back you can find it that way. |
|
|
| itsTrueSonic |
| quote: | Originally posted by chavs
It's big enough to screw the search function. |
wow .. well we can all say the search function in tranceaddict is very complicated to comprehend and may take months to analyze the pure logistics of the function.
i hear that the search function has boggled the minds of calculus geniuses who have fully comprehended 'Simpson's Law'. :haha: |
|
|
| Swamper |
http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...863#post3506863
Search works, it is just, well, SLOW. The problem becomes worse when ppl click search again thinking it didn't go through (when it did) and then that just causes even more bottlenecking (since their first search is still being carried out).
I see so many useless search queries, like 'video', 'tiesto', 'good tracks'. You gotta be a little bit more specific, or else, it'll take forever.
Exact phrase searches work much better than keyword searches |
|
|
| Mebot |
| quote: | Originally posted by Swamper
I see so many useless search queries, like 'video', 'tiesto', 'good tracks'. You gotta be a little bit more specific, or else, it'll take forever.
Exact phrase searches work much better than keyword searches |
Oh noes!!!11 swamper is watching our every move! he's spying on what we're searching for!!!1
that's worse than a spybot :whip:
Neo's coming! RUN!!!11111 |
|
|
| itsTrueSonic |
| quote: | Originally posted by Swamper
http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...863#post3506863
Search works, it is just, well, SLOW. The problem becomes worse when ppl click search again thinking it didn't go through (when it did) and then that just causes even more bottlenecking (since their first search is still being carried out).
I see so many useless search queries, like 'video', 'tiesto', 'good tracks'. You gotta be a little bit more specific, or else, it'll take forever.
Exact phrase searches work much better than keyword searches |
hmm.. if you keep track of everything that people search for, can you create a popular searches section, where it lists the most common searches people look for? |
|
|
| Swamper |
"Proof that the search button is adware. Swamper sees everything that we search for."
What's with your sig? I don't understand what you're getting at with the term adware.
What I do see are queries that bottleneck the server due to excessive execution time - which I then sometimes kill off manually because they're taking 4+ minutes to return the query results. |
|
|
| occrider |
| Swamper sees our searches? Uh oh ... I guess I should stop searching for beastiality and snuff porn in here. |
|
|
| Dervish |
| quote: | Originally posted by occrider
Swamper sees our searches? Uh oh ... I guess I should stop searching for beastiality and snuff porn in here. |
We have that here.......... why was I not informed?
:sadgreen:
:stongue: |
|
|
| jp |
He reads all our PM's too :o
2000 a day :nervous: |
|
|
|
|
