|
2.5 gigapixel picture (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ FC
Well the image is spliced from several images. There is no digital technology which can capture 2.5 gigapixle with a single lense. |
that made no sence to me :p but then again when it comes to technology i suck! |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by nchs09
that made no sence to me :p but then again when it comes to technology i suck! |
The picture is made out of hundreds (thousands?) smaller pictures. That's why there are bits of some objects missing because it wasn't there when the other pic was taken etc. |
|
|
| mezzir |
| it was 600 pictures at 3008x1960 pixels each i believe |
|
|
| Tranceporter99 |
| yeah i figured that out shortly after when i tired to right click using firefox, but it got pixalted with the first zoom, i was like god damn hoax |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by Tranceporter99
yeah i figured that out shortly after when i tired to right click using firefox, but it got pixalted with the first zoom, i was like god damn hoax |
How can it be a hoax when it's explained right there on the site? |
|
|
| Swamper |
| if you zoom in real close you can see someone on TA being a post whore! |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by Swamper
if you zoom in real close you can see someone on TA being a post whore! |
No way, there are no postwhores here. |
|
|
| kamil |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ FC
Well the image is spliced from several images. There is no digital technology which can capture 2.5 gigapixle with a single lense. |
not YET at least ;) |
|
|
| tc-fan |
| i would of picked a nude beach...from far away |
|
|
| mezzir |
| quote: | Originally posted by tc-fan
i would of picked a nude beach...from far away |
genius! |
|
|
| Aristronica |
| wow, yeah i just wasted 10 minutes of my life and it was worth it for once, that's really cool |
|
|
|
|
