|
Technics RP-DJ1200 Headphones
|
View this Thread in Original format
| che |
Good/Bad??
Whats a good price for them? |
|
|
| mr. poopyhead |
they're hard to find... i used to have a pair... i know you can find them at bay bloor radio... i got mine for 120.
they sound good for dj type applications i guess. they handle a lot of power (around 1000mW), and take a lot of abuse... imo, they're a lot better than sony v700. the bass is a lot clearer, on the technics, and the dj1200s handle more power, so you can get more volume without distortion.
mine died, because the wiring in the swiveling earcup was faulty, and years of swiveling evntually wore the wire down and it died... i fixed them myself but they died again becuase i did a half ass soldering job... the second time i was fixing them, i broke them and got pissed and threw them onto my friend's driveway...
if you're not a dj, then i don't think they're good headphones... very bass heavy. don't get me wrong, they sound good, but there are better sounding headphones for the same price, if you don't need DJ features.
personally, i've moved on to open headphones... they sound a lot better, though they block out less noise... i now have a pair of grado SR125 headphones... i highly recommend them. you can get them for 200 bucks at audio one, on steeles near 404. www.audio-one.ca
but go to bay bloor radio and try out their wall of headphones. shop around and follow your ears. |
|
|
| DJ_Ampz |
Saw them at Play Da Record eh? $89. I dont know how good they are but that seems like a deal!
Ampz |
|
|
| che |
i've looked online and saw they are quite expensive and got pretty good reviews. i found them today at, believe it or not, The Bay?? they were marked $199 but i got them for $70. i though it was steal so i picked them up....
thx for the info though...much appreaciated |
|
|
| j@y |
senheiser hd-25 is the way to go!
unveileveble headphone
they dont quite have the look
but they sound like nothing else:D |
|
|
| dallastar |
| the sounds was sooooooooo krisp and volume so GREAT!;) |
|
|
| DJ_Ampz |
| quote: | Originally posted by j@y
senheiser hd-25 is the way to go!
unveileveble headphone
they dont quite have the look
but they sound like nothing else:D |
Im looking for the best deal for these :)
Ampz |
|
|
| dallastar |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ_Ampz
Im looking for the best deal for these :)
Ampz |
che say's :"Go to the bay - the christmas store" |
|
|
| Magnetonium |
| quote: | Originally posted by dallastar
the sounds was sooooooooo krisp and volume so GREAT!;) |
I own SONY MDR-7509 PROFESSIONAL Dynamic Stereo Headphones, and they kick ass ... was looking for the best headphones I could find this summer, and I dont think there are anyt better out there. So I got them for 300 bucks.
I STRONGLY SUGGEST YOU BUY THESE, IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR QUALITY!
Had them for over 6 months now, never had a problem.
Trust me, THESE headphones are the BEST! :eyespop:
 |
|
|
| j@y |
SOny?!?!?!?!
comon guys....evrything made by sony sounds the same
always the same type of sound.....not that good
they might be real good....but i really doubt they are a good investement
i bought mine for 310$ canadian bucks and they have a 2 year waranty
i read a lot of comments on the internet about them
lot of people told they can witstand 4 hours/daily use for up to 10 years
never heard any other headphones with such lifespend
if you buy sony's....mdr-700...ok they look cool and sound is ok
but they always break after one or 2 years of use...you loose one ear....and then they crack....or they crack before!
anyways..i had sony's and stanton's before
im never getting myself a pair of these anymore
ing 200 and more for only a year or two
worst deal ever:D |
|
|
| rabbitjoker |
| ^^^^--- although useful information, you neglect to mention the brand or model. |
|
|
| dallastar |
| quote: | Originally posted by rabbitjoker
^^^^--- although useful information, you neglect to mention the brand or model. |
HAHAHAHAHHA
SONY SONY SONY!@ - they are probably the only company that has a 2 - 3 year warranty as well. . . . . . . :o |
|
|
|
|
