|
Super String Theory - Theory of Everything (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Zild |
| No. I'm not agreeing with Tomer that science is disproving any of my spiritual beliefs at all, actually I believe the opposite. I'm going to be a scientist in a few years so I do have a slight idea of what I'm talking about. What if I tell you that the Egyptians believed in the spiritual tenet of vibration. Meaning that nothing in the universe is at rest, that everything is in a constant state of vibration. Now thats an idea that up until just recently would seem completely ridiculous. Modern science how now proved this belief to be absolutely true. |
|
|
| zig |
| ye but the idea is rediculous;) |
|
|
| Zild |
| The idea of vibration? Yep, totally ridiculous seeing as how everything is made up of even smaller parts that never really stop moving. This applies to humans, plants, animals, carpet, computers, turntables, desktop CDJs, bottled water, Guinness and everything else on this planet. |
|
|
| Dj Tomer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zild
What if I tell you that the Egyptians believed in the spiritual tenet of vibration. Meaning that nothing in the universe is at rest, that everything is in a constant state of vibration. Now thats an idea that up until just recently would seem completely ridiculous. Modern science how now proved this belief to be absolutely true. |
I fail to see your point. If the Egyptians believed something, and it has only recently been proved by modern science, what does that have to do with science crediting/discrediting religion? |
|
|
| Dj Tomer |
| quote: | Originally posted by zig
Are Zild and Tomer the same person i wonder..........;) ? |
that would be SOME split personality ;) |
|
|
| Zild |
| Tomer because the tenet of vibration is only one of seven laid out by the Egyptians way before Christ (although its believed Christ was an initiate to the Egyptian mysteries.) I'm not here to teach a class in comparative religion so I won't delve any further but I hope you can see my point. |
|
|
| Dj Tomer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zild
Tomer because the tenet of vibration is only one of seven laid out by the Egyptians way before Christ (although its believed Christ was an initiate to the Egyptian mysteries.) I'm not here to teach a class in comparative religion so I won't delve any further but I hope you can see my point. |
I hope you understand that a person with little knowledge of religion, especially christianity (such as myself), would have no clue what the hell you're trying to say. But like you said, dont go into it any further, this is a useless discussion anyway. |
|
|
| ::TranceVanDyk:: |
strange how every topic turns into a religious debate.
its theorized that a particle called an anti-matter, a particle of energy with no mass is the basic components of everything, u cant get any smaller than this thing. very interesting:happy2: |
|
|
| Dj Tomer |
| quote: | Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
strange how every topic turns into a religious debate.
its theorized that a particle called an anti-matter, a particle of energy with no mass is the basic components of everything, u cant get any smaller than this thing. very interesting:happy2: |
huh? superstrings are the basic components of everything, scientists still dont know what dark matter is really |
|
|
| ::TranceVanDyk:: |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dj Tomer
huh? superstrings are the basic components of everything, scientists still dont know what dark matter is really |
yet something else to research. our technology is too low-tech. but just the idea of it, and how mathematically, its feasible and able to be described in a way is very interesting.
im off too bed, good debatin today lads |
|
|
| Sevas Stra |
| this reminds me of Angels and Deamons and Anti-Matter... |
|
|
| Zild |
| quote: | Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
yet something else to research. our technology is too low-tech. but just the idea of it, and how mathematically, its feasible and able to be described in a way is very interesting.
im off too bed, good debatin today lads |
You sir are correct. Human science and engineering is in its infantcy. |
|
|
|
|
