|
US 'erodes' global human rights? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| x-filer |
| quote: | Originally posted by zig
LOL..your english is getting better..LOL
|
hey what the ! I live in Chicago so my english is good and i at least know how to speack another language other than english. So HA HA HA 2 u! |
|
|
| zig |
| quote: | Originally posted by x-filer
wut? now i am just lost thanks u . |
Well translate that for a start...LOL |
|
|
| x-filer |
| quote: | Originally posted by zig
Well translate that for a start...LOL |
what? Thanks to you I am now lost. Thank you, you :) |
|
|
| zig |
| quote: | Originally posted by x-filer
what? Thanks to you I am now lost. Thank you, you :) |
ok...LOL |
|
|
| Dj Tomer |
| quote: | Originally posted by x-filer
hey what the ! I live in Chicago so my english is good and i at least know how to speack another language other than english. So HA HA HA 2 u! |
Want a medal? |
|
|
| x-filer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dj Tomer
Want a medal? |
sure u ing canadian. |
|
|
| BadBadNeil |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
If I'm not mistaken, that comment was much more along the lines of "racism" than anything that BadBadNeil said. You just made a broad sweeping generalization about Puerto Ricans. Not to mention your typing skills badly need improvement. |
exactly
edit: sorry for bringing this to an off topic thread. My first post was at the thread starter and when comments that seemed to be racial were sent my way for no reason I felt I needed to respond.
Please continue with the thread as intended |
|
|
| St_Andrew |
| quote: | Originally posted by BadBadNeil
you are right! and while we are at it I say we don't spend a single cent on any other nation on this planet until we solve all our problems first! |
well, if you did solve all your problems, i for one wouldnt have any huge problems with that ;) now that would be a really hard thing to do tho. my point is that you should at least take really big messurements against things that contradict your basic values which now is one of the few reasons left as to why you want to war... |
|
|
| zig |
| quote: | Originally posted by BadBadNeil
exactly
edit: sorry for bringing this to an off topic thread. My first post was at the thread starter and when comments that seemed to be racial were sent my way for no reason I felt I needed to respond.
Please continue with the thread as intended |
Naw i didnt think you meant me..but just checked to clarify..anyway you did me a favour..i havnt had such a good laugh in weeks trying to decipher x-filers posts..he can speak 2 languages and most of them i cant understand...ROFL..LOL:stongue: |
|
|
| BadBadNeil |
| quote: | Originally posted by zig
Naw i didnt think you meant me..but just checked to clarify..anyway you did me a favour..i havnt had such a good laugh in weeks trying to decipher x-filers posts..he can speak 2 languages and most of them i cant understand...ROFL..LOL:stongue: |
:D you and me both!
| quote: |
well, if you did solve all your problems, i for one wouldnt have any huge problems with that now that would be a really hard thing to do tho. my point is that you should at least take really big messurements against things that contradict your basic values which now is one of the few reasons left as to why you want to war...
|
Well the article bases the US human global rights only on two things,
Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, not against our own citizens or normal combatants. The values are a bit skewed in that the US is stuck in a hard place with these two examples in that unlike a Germany in world war II where you could let prisoners go and they just go back to their lives without an army to join, these prisoners (as seen recently in pakistan) when released will just go back to join the jihad and kill innocents. Do you risk releasing them when you know this will happen?
I'd like to get details on the interrogation techniques before I make personal judgement if they are excessively harsh. |
|
|
| St_Andrew |
| quote: | Originally posted by BadBadNeil
Well the article bases the US human global rights only on two things,
Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, not against our own citizens or normal combatants. The values are a bit skewed in that the US is stuck in a hard place with these two examples in that unlike a Germany in world war II where you could let prisoners go and they just go back to their lives without an army to join, these prisoners (as seen recently in pakistan) when released will just go back to join the jihad and kill innocents. Do you risk releasing them when you know this will happen?
I'd like to get details on the interrogation techniques before I make personal judgement if they are excessively harsh. |
well, i dont have any problem with you having POWs or whatever, but i do have a problem when they dont even get a trial, and when they get abused. The bush adminstration has not taken the abuse problem seriously at all imo, which gives a bad message. |
|
|
| BadBadNeil |
| quote: | Originally posted by St_Andrew
well, i dont have any problem with you having POWs or whatever, but i do have a problem when they dont even get a trial, and when they get abused. The bush adminstration has not taken the abuse problem seriously at all imo, which gives a bad message. |
What do you recommend? They have already yanked those responsible in the photos and are putting them on trial. Unless you are saying that the abuse orders came from his mouth. |
|
|
|
|
