|
They should ban clubs and nightlife because......... (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Jayx1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vivid Boy
dont people in see we're losing our freedom slowly, till one day we will not be living by our rules but by one persons. some dick on top? |
Looks like my excersize is working. |
|
|
| newr |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vivid Boy
i think alchol should be banned because its poisonous for the body and people tend to drink while on it.
|
Well me... you tend to drink when on alcohol... Somebody call some scientists to observe this unusual behaviour when on alcohol |
|
|
| j_spot |
heres where youre wrong
pitbulls-attack other people
smoking- you can still smoke, just not in people workplace
SUVs-dangerous vehicles to everybody else on the road. insane consumption of a non renewable ressource.
clubbing-can only hurt yourself
drinking-only hurt yourself
guns-they arent banned, just the ones that arent needed (what is the personal use of an assault rifle?) |
|
|
| VERTiG0 |
| quote: | Originally posted by j_spot
(what is the personal use of an assault rifle?) |
To blow the out of
...I've got nothin. Sorry :p |
|
|
| Jayx1 |
-alcohol affects others because if you drink and drive then you might hurt someone.
-You can get into a fight at a club
..and many more examples that im sure the people with the control arguement about other things will easily come up with.
-Pitbulls like clubs provide entertainment and companionship
-Smoking like alcohol provides a drug as a relaxant
-SUVs like clubs serve a societal purpose even if they are a voyage into the world of the excess
how can you apply your flawed logic to one set of examples (that dont affect you) and not to the other that does? |
|
|
| Crazy Serb |
| ...matrix is everywhere, all around you, Neo... ;) |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by Jayx1
-alcohol affects others because if you drink and drive then you might hurt someone.
-You can get into a fight at a club
..and many more examples that im sure the people with the control arguement about other things will easily come up with.
-Pitbulls like clubs provide entertainment and companionship
-Smoking like alcohol provides a drug as a relaxant
-SUVs like clubs serve a societal purpose even if they are a voyage into the world of the excess
how can you apply your flawed logic to one set of examples (that dont affect you) and not to the other that does? |
When the pitbull is ripping your face off, it's not the nicest form of companionship. You can still smoke all you like, but now it's respecting the non-smokers and not subjecting them to it. SUV's can easily be replaced with something more efficient and o-zone friendly :p.
It is people like you who do not want anything to change that will keep things the same way: going straight to the toilet. If you hadn't noticed, our society and planet are in a shambles, and finally someone is trying to patch things up. Change is not necessarily a bad thing. |
|
|
| RobbyG. |
| Lets ban planet Earth:crazy: |
|
|
| Tully |
If we sit back and let people take away the things away - They will!!!
Clubs will not be banned because they are a major tourist attraction in the city. The Toronto clubbing scene is becoming more popular every year. To ban clubs and nightlife would be like banning theatres, concerts and other forms of entertainment. WHat would be the point of that. |
|
|
| Brindor |
 |
|
|
| Jayx1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
When the pitbull is ripping your face off, it's not the nicest form of companionship. You can still smoke all you like, but now it's respecting the non-smokers and not subjecting them to it. SUV's can easily be replaced with something more efficient and o-zone friendly :p.
It is people like you who do not want anything to change that will keep things the same way: going straight to the toilet. If you hadn't noticed, our society and planet are in a shambles, and finally someone is trying to patch things up. Change is not necessarily a bad thing. |
Change is a good thing but not when:
1) its for the sake of change
2) it's over correcting the original "problem"
3) it creates more problems than it solves (such as trampling on someone's rights)
Last i checked most dogs have the ability to "rip your face off". As for not subjecting smokers to smoke, thats what smoking rooms and patio smoking were for. And SUVs? Well i hope you dont ever drive in a personal automobile sista because i'm now telling you to practice what you preach and ALWAYS take transit. |
|
|
|
|
