|
hot 97 morning show done messed up (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Konijn |
| firing someone for a matter of speech, however offensive it might be, is not the right move and sets a terrible precedent... |
|
|
| trunks1022 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Konijn
firing someone for a matter of speech, however offensive it might be, is not the right move and sets a terrible precedent... |
it's been done before. |
|
|
| Konijn |
| i know but it's still a ty move |
|
|
| trunks1022 |
eh
lots of corporations have policies for racist/sexist remarks. and most of the consequences involve termination of employment. this isn't any different. it's just that these remarks were made by corporate employees in a public forum. |
|
|
| BxNemo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Stassi
i already posted the song, and its off jins site, its not going anywhere soon.
and its not a freestyle..
by the way, i just got word the hot97 morning staff is fired. |
GOOD!!!! HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH! i love it! |
|
|
| dj tek |
youre fired |
|
|
| trunks1022 |
| quote: | Originally posted by dj tek
youre fired |
oh god... fellow penn alum with bad hairdo!!!!
:wtf: |
|
|
| verndogs |
| quote: | Originally posted by Konijn
firing someone for a matter of speech, however offensive it might be, is not the right move and sets a terrible precedent... |
it's called damage control
and it's a GOOD precedent |
|
|
| Konijn |
| quote: | Originally posted by trunks1022
eh
lots of corporations have policies for racist/sexist remarks. and most of the consequences involve termination of employment. this isn't any different. it's just that these remarks were made by corporate employees in a public forum. |
yea, but this isn't an accountant offending people in the middle of a boardroom meeting; this is putting the clamps on someone who's paid to voice (outrageous and controversial) positions in a public medium.
if arbitron ratings had fallen as a result of the controversy and the morning staff was fired as a result of low ratings it would constitute a business decision and would thus be a different story. but the staff was fired solely for the content of their speech.
when you start firing people for the they say it can't help but send a chill down the spine of anyone who works in a similar forum or who produces a good for public consumption.
there's a thin line between being creative and iconoclastic and being vile; just ask damien hirst, howard stern, andres serrano, lenny bruce or jimmy the greek... |
|
|
| BxNemo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Konijn
yea, but this isn't an accountant offending people in the middle of a boardroom meeting; this is putting the clamps on someone who's paid to voice (outrageous and controversial) positions in a public medium.
if arbitron ratings had fallen as a result of the controversy and the morning staff was fired as a result of low ratings it would constitute a business decision and would thus be a different story. but the staff was fired solely for the content of their speech.
when you start firing people for the they say it can't help but send a chill down the spine of anyone who works in a similar forum or who produces a good for public consumption.
there's a thin line between being creative and iconoclastic and being vile; just ask damien hirst, howard stern, andres serrano, lenny bruce or jimmy the greek... |
Honestly, after what they did and said the ratings for hot 97 were gonna go down, i can't tell the future but the reason i'm saying that is because hot 97 started falling off a while ago and after this it's not gonna give them a better image so i guess the managers of hot 97 were just doing the inevitable |
|
|
| trunks1022 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Konijn
yea, but this isn't an accountant offending people in the middle of a boardroom meeting; this is putting the clamps on someone who's paid to voice (outrageous and controversial) positions in a public medium. |
so u mean to tell me that this didn't offend people in the public realm? outrageous and controversial does not excuse anyone from saying anything racist at all. your point there is invalid.
having a staff member explicitly say that he would like to shoot asian people in the course of an argument about an offensive song isn't exactly having a position on a controversial issue. it's blatant racism |
|
|
| Konijn |
| quote: | Originally posted by trunks1022
so u mean to tell me that this didn't offend people in the public realm? outrageous and controversial does not excuse anyone from saying anything racist at all. your point there is invalid. |
my point was that many things offend many sensibilities. the photographer andres serrano, who i mentioned in the previous posts, has made a career of displaying images that hundreds of thousands of christians have found to be sacrilegious (pics of christ submerged in urine and blood, etc); damian hirst is a sculptor who, among other mediums, likes to work with decomposing animal carcasses, again offending countless people; lenny bruce was a pioneering disc jokey in the 1970s -- the original 'shock jock' -- and millions of people protested him for his offensive antics; howard stern, a character i assume you're familiar with, has been fined millions for vulgarities and yes, racism, in his twenty years on the air.
-- the last point, incidentally, debunks your position that lowered ratings would naturally follow a flood of protests at hot 97...
i guess i'm just the resident civil libertarian here... |
|
|
|
|
