Is the MC-909 any good for trance production??
|
View this Thread in Original format
DJ ICE777 |
I was wondering if the MC-909 groovebox was any good for trance production. i have read a lot about it and listened to some samples that were made by the groove box only. it sounds really nice and looks like a neat tool to have in your studio (if you have the money:confused: )
I was wondering if anybody at TA had a MC-909 and could tell me how much money they wasted, or how many songs they successfully created.
Thanks!! DJ ICE777 |
|
|
pho mo |
Depends where you're at. I started out 2 years ago with a 505 groovebox, and it's the best fun in the world. Really easy to work with, lots of fat beats and the best thing is you can write trance in your lounge. I learnt alot about the basic structure + elements of trance in that time. I probably have about 12 songs from that year, all done on the 505. I love my MC-505!!
After a year of having fun with that, I started to realise the sound quality was never quite there (or even almost) - the reason? the 505 has reverb/delay per track but not eq, compression, phasing etc. etc. Professional trance has an awful lot of fx processing per-track and it's just not possible to get the same sound out of a single groovebox.
Now the 505 is relegated to the rainy-day synth when I just want to have fun, and as my only hardware synth source when I need an alternative to VSTi's. Cubase + VSTis were the way forward without a doubt. If you want to eventually have a hardware synth in your studio, then I'd buy a dedicated VA synth, not a groovebox.
Buy one, and enjoy! You'll love it! But in the end you'll only get a pro sound out of a fully-fledged software studio, or a massively expensive hardware one. Depends on where you want to end up!
Hope my little story helps ;) |
|
|
foranAngel4553 |
see Nu-Nrg they uses a MC-909 in yours live acts.
personally i dont know this machine :( |
|
|
DeZmA |
quote: | Originally posted by pho mo
Depends where you're at. I started out 2 years ago with a 505 groovebox, and it's the best fun in the world. Really easy to work with, lots of fat beats and the best thing is you can write trance in your lounge. I learnt alot about the basic structure + elements of trance in that time. I probably have about 12 songs from that year, all done on the 505. I love my MC-505!!
After a year of having fun with that, I started to realise the sound quality was never quite there (or even almost) - the reason? the 505 has reverb/delay per track but not eq, compression, phasing etc. etc. Professional trance has an awful lot of fx processing per-track and it's just not possible to get the same sound out of a single groovebox.
Now the 505 is relegated to the rainy-day synth when I just want to have fun, and as my only hardware synth source when I need an alternative to VSTi's. Cubase + VSTis were the way forward without a doubt. If you want to eventually have a hardware synth in your studio, then I'd buy a dedicated VA synth, not a groovebox.
Buy one, and enjoy! You'll love it! But in the end you'll only get a pro sound out of a fully-fledged software studio, or a massively expensive hardware one. Depends on where you want to end up!
Hope my little story helps ;) |
straight on !!
you do have to realise the mc 909 has more efx tho and has 16 tracks to sequence. The 505 can make semi decent songs all by itself if you have even a bit skills, and I think the mc 909 can make really cool songs. If you ever think to go live, it's better to mute/unmute tracks than a mouse ;)
Just remember it will never be wasted money, I sampled all the drums out of my mc (hi quality stuff !) and there is not one song I didn't use a sample of it, the classic instruments aren't that bad either. It sounds really good in the mix but for really pro leads you'll need a VA |
|
|
|
|