|
Do you increase the DB when mastering? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Derivative |
| yea thats what i tend to do. i have compressors on everything. and a tendancy to compress the living out of anything on top of that. i think its becoming a problem. the bassline from my last track is compressed twice on a dedicated mixer channel and again in the master channel. it feels pretty warm though and my ears arent complaining too much...yet ;) |
|
|
| Atlantis_AR |
| quote: | Originally posted by serp
this is usually my process..
1. tiny EQ cuts on the entire mix
2. multiband comp
3. limit to around -2dB never limit to 0dB as this can cause distortion on some (older) cd players |
I'm sure you mean -0.2 dB. ;)
As for compressing twice: True, though I'm personally against doing so much compression. I suppose some mixes would call for it, though. If so I would probably tell whoever made the track to go back and make another mix. |
|
|
| Atlantis_AR |
Oh and by the way, to answer the original topic question: Sure you can. I often receive mixes that require mastering, which haven't been mixed down all that well, and I can easily end up boosting up to around 1-1.5 dB if needed. Still, I cut far more than I boost, as it should be. ;)
Or wait, is this topic about EQing, or limiting? :conf: |
|
|
| serp |
| quote: | Originally posted by Atlantis_AR
I'm sure you mean -0.2 dB. ;)
As for compressing twice: True, though I'm personally against doing so much compression. I suppose some mixes would call for it, though. If so I would probably tell whoever made the track to go back and make another mix. |
hha yes ! oops :D |
|
|
| Vizay |
well to much compression should always be avoided if possible since it can get pretty rough for your ears if it's overdone.
when it comes to EQing I tend to work after a general rule of thumb, if you need to boost or cut more than 1db then redo the mixdown. I've noticed that most bedroom producers do to much EQing in the mastering process instead of just going back and redo the mix.
I've said it before and I'm going to say it again, never mix up the mixing and mastering! :) |
|
|
| serp |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vizay
well to much compression should always be avoided if possible since it can get pretty rough for your ears if it's overdone.
when it comes to EQing I tend to work after a general rule of thumb, if you need to boost or cut more than 1db then redo the mixdown. I've noticed that most bedroom producers do to much EQing in the mastering process instead of just going back and redo the mix.
I've said it before and I'm going to say it again, never mix up the mixing and mastering! :) |
exactly |
|
|
| Derivative |
| quote: | | well to much compression should always be avoided if possible since it can get pretty rough for your ears if it's overdone. |
really? i find it does the opposite. cuz it reduces dynamic range i find theres less big sharp spikes of sound which rip into your ears. compressing my hats seems to reduce some of the sharpness and the sibilance and makes them tighter, snappier and more playable at higher levels without fatigue.
my old tracks are waaay harsher on my ears than my new ones. the old ones before i even knew what compressors were. they really destroy your ears... |
|
|
| staticblue |
| I think Vizay meant that overcompressed tracks get your ears tired on the long term, as it's always loud and smack in the face even during breaks. |
|
|
| Derivative |
| yea but that depends on how you compress it. if you just have a brickwall compressor where the idea is to get the absolute loudest possible sound ever then yea it'll probably caine your ears and it'll be clipped to . use a soft knee and keep the gain down and you can smooth things out a bit. |
|
|
| serp |
| lol, think of it this way, what would be more painful to listen to... a dentists drill for a minute straight or a dentists drill one second at a time at 5 second intervals (for a minute), vaugue i know but it basically explains the theory behind it |
|
|
| Vizay |
| quote: | Originally posted by staticblue
I think Vizay meant that overcompressed tracks get your ears tired on the long term, as it's always loud and smack in the face even during breaks. |
youu that was my point, I was a bit vague about it wich might have been a bit clumsy of me :p
thanks for pointing it out for me ;)
of course compression in the right ammounts can be a really good thing. As you mentioned derivative a perfect ammount of compression on for example a hat just makes it easier to listen to.
But even though your'e not talking brick wall compression I think it's better to stay off heavy compression as far as it's possible, you have to remember that a track without any dynamics at all is a very boring track. You have to find that perfect balance between to much and to little compression. It's a matter of making the trac keasy on your ears without destroying all the dynamics :)
I'm starting to understand why people call this a black art :p |
|
|
| Rob |
The subjective loudness of popular CD's range from as much as 10-12db. Am I the only one who has a problem with this or is everyone deaf? Take any two CD's and you'll be reaching for the volumn as one is lifeless and dull while the other one jumps out at you.
For a proffesional industry (and I use the term professional loosely here) I think it's unnacceptable, especially in comparison to film leveling practices (which are all standardised mind you). Within the last 8 years, CD's are starting to sound shiiter and ter. Some are so ing loud and distorted that the average volumn is almost as high as the peak. With that in mind, who gives a whether you compress before you eq, just compress it until it's a square wave. That's all mastering is about. |
|
|
|
|
