|
Would the life of a few worth the life of all?
|
View this Thread in Original format
| RenderedDream |
We all have watched movies where the good guy has to choose to save the lifes of a few or something important to all, like experimenting cancer cure on criminals and etc..
in extreme cases, the life of only one person is on the line and she is chosen to be saved..
dunno if i made myself clear but what would you choose?
the life of a few or the cure to all diseases? |
|
|
| jonSun |
The life of a few I would choose. We need diseases to control the population.
BTW, ask Cyrus what he thinks about this. :haha: |
|
|
| mezzir |
| quote: | | Originally posted by jonSun BTW, ask Cyrus what he thinks about this. :haha: |
:stongue: :stongue: :stongue: |
|
|
| Spartan |
not if it were people I didn't know
p.s. you sound like Spock, some fellow nerds will get it |
|
|
| jonze234 |
| have you been watching Swordfish? |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| Depends on who the few are. If they're average jerkoffs, let 'em die. If they're actually people I give a about, obviously I'd try to help 'em out. |
|
|
| insecurity |
^agree^
it all depends on the given situation, who's involved & what is at stake
| quote: | Originally posted by jonSun
BTW, ask Cyrus what he thinks about this. :haha: |
:toothless
I love that thread, everyone is so passionate, yet hostile
(just like in those 'iPod vs other Mp3 players' threads) :rolleyes: :p |
|
|
|
|
