return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > Canada > Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 
7 Megapixel camera.....PHONE! (pg. 3)
View this Thread in Original format
malek
http://www.pbase.com/estoile49/auto_show

these were taken with the Tamron 17-35
drgoodvibe
quote:
Originally posted by malek
yeah, but the tamron is still better than the 18-55mm.

And that 16-35 L F2.8 is way over my budget (2k) at this moment...


definitly true enough, I took a look at the pics you posted, I can't see any obvious abherations, but then the pics are reduced in size and such. Not bad at all.
zokissima
7 mp, that's just overkill. I can't imagine why anyone would want this much in a phone, as sending pics of that size would be very limited to a few that have enough space on their phones to receive it.
SurrJRS
quote:
Originally posted by zokissima
7 mp, that's just overkill. I can't imagine why anyone would want this much in a phone, as sending pics of that size would be very limited to a few that have enough space on their phones to receive it.


Uh. "640KB ought to be enough for anybody."

And I quoted him correctly this time Durafei! :)

EDIT: Oh and BTW, 35mm film would be the equivalent to ~25 megapixels.
zokissima
yeha, didn't read the post right. Still, it's just the same old, bigger-better-louder doctrine :D
starsearcher
quote:
Originally posted by SurrJRS
EDIT: Oh and BTW, 35mm film would equivalent to ~25 megapixels.


Really? wow that's massive ;)...cool good to know!

Although I always wonder how do they make those MASSIVE billboards without damaging the quality? :conf:
SurrJRS
quote:
Originally posted by starsearcher
Really? wow that's massive ;)...cool good to know!

Although I always wonder how do they make those MASSIVE billboards without damaging the quality? :conf:


I had heard that a while back, and confirmed it with a google search on "film 25 megapixels"

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm

"If you do fret the pixel counts, I find that it takes about 25 megapixels to simulate 35mm film, which is still far more than any practical digital camera."
starsearcher
hhmmm interesting...but i still don't know how they create those MAAAAAAAASSIVE billboard type prints :p...
SurrJRS
quote:
Originally posted by starsearcher
hhmmm interesting...but i still don't know how they create those MAAAAAAAASSIVE billboard type prints :p...


Multiple shots, and use the stitch assist software to bind them together. Bah, I'm talking outa my ass, I don't actually know...
starsearcher
quote:
Originally posted by SurrJRS
Multiple shots, and use the stitch assist software to bind them together. Bah, I'm talking outa my ass, I don't actually know...


:stongue: :stongue: :haha: :haha:

zokissima
If you have a very high quality image scan of a 35mm shot, or from a very good digicam, there are utilities that can enlarge the pictures on a grand scale, while internal algorithms resolve colour saturation, quality, and other factors like that. We used to do that at a place I worked at. It's just one method, but I'm sure that there are several.
drgoodvibe
the massive billboards are done using large/medium format photography. NOT 35MM

http://www.largeformatphotography.info/why.html
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 
Privacy Statement