|
Question about CDJ-800
|
View this Thread in Original format
| 3xx3r7 |
I've been looking for this everywhere but can't find it.
What are the smallest pitch increments (in percentage) on CDJ-800? |
|
|
| Cheetah86 |
| 0.05% at the smallest range. |
|
|
| beats and beeps |
0.05 on it.
If you need 0.02 the cdj200 will be out soon and it has 0.02, also the denon dns3000 has 0.02. |
|
|
| 3xx3r7 |
| Hmm... That's odd. I thought CDJ-800 had smaller increments than 200. Is it worth waiting for 200 or is it a good idea to get 800, if money is not a problem in this decision. |
|
|
| beats and beeps |
| It depends on whether or not you want 0.02. |
|
|
| Inertia |
| the CDJ-200 will basically be an 800 with +/-0.02% pitch increments and no vinyl emulation. in other words, a lot more practical for trance DJs, as most don't scratch. |
|
|
| mndeg |
| no cool zabiela tricks? :( |
|
|
| Inertia |
sadly, no.
i want 1000Mk2s. of course, i can't afford em. so, even though the 200 seems a lot more practical than the 800, given it comes out at a cheaper price, i'd still prefer the 800 just to experiment with turntablism. even if i never use it, I WANT TO LEARN TO SCRATCH. |
|
|
| 3xx3r7 |
| Damn, if they have no vinyl mode, then it is a no-no for me. That is how I am used to cueing. |
|
|
| beats and beeps |
I would be more concerned about being able to hold a mix for a long time, rather than avoiding learning to cue in a new way.
Not that you cant hold a mix with 0.05, but I will tell you I do notice quite a difference between the 0.05 on the cdj800s that I own now, compared to the 0.02 on the denons that I previously owned. |
|
|
| dinoXpress |
| quote: | Originally posted by 3xx3r7
Damn, if they have no vinyl mode, then it is a no-no for me. That is how I am used to cueing. |
thats is the bets way to cue on the pios. so much more human. |
|
|
|
|
