TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Album Reviews / New Releases Discussion Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  Tiesto - Adagio For Strings ( Phynn Remix ) (pg. 4) View this Thread in Original format swisstoni_uk quote: Originally posted by skip william orbit didn't do the original though :rolleyes: lol im well aware of that thankyou :haha:. I am speaking from a Trance perspective. skip quote: Originally posted by swisstoni_uk lol im well aware of that thankyou :haha:. I am speaking from a Trance perspective. you think william orbit's version is trance? :conf: domineesje 8/10 :gsmile: RebeL9 quote: Originally posted by skip you think william orbit's version is trance? :conf: dont be a sissy. i think he meant that William Orbit was the one which made an electronic intepretation of Samuel Barbers Adagio for strings skip quote: Originally posted by RebeL9 dont be a sissy. i think he meant that William Orbit was the one which made an electronic intepretation of Samuel Barbers Adagio for strings well i have no idea whatsoever what he meant and that's why i'm asking. seems more like pointless bashing to me (because tiësto isn't cool) tbh. ;) djAlexg CAn someone tell my why THE FU*K the vinyl is labeled as TIESTO - ADAGIO FOR STRINGS??wtf did tiesto had to do with Adagio For Strings instead of just remixing?its not his track..he didn't composed or produced it? Damn Tiesto...taking all the credit as usual for the money skip quote: Originally posted by djAlexg CAn someone tell my why THE FU*K the vinyl is labeled as TIESTO - ADAGIO FOR STRINGS??wtf did tiesto had to do with Adagio For Strings instead of just remixing?its not his track..he didn't composed or produced it? Damn Tiesto...taking all the credit as usual for the money he did produce it. he didn't compose it. what should it be called then in your opinion? Bertn quote: Originally posted by skip he did produce it. he didn't compose it. what should it be called then in your opinion? samuel barber - adagio for strings (tiesto remix) :D skip i'll just post my reply from this thread here. quote: Originally posted by skip oh my! here we go again. if you make a cover of a track you release it under your own name. look at all the rock/pop covers for example. you don't see joan jett - i love rock 'n roll (britney spears remix) now do you? and he did not remix william orbit's version either and he didn't remix samuel barber's original, he did produce the track, but what he didn't do is compose it. even if he had wanted to release it as william orbit - barber's adagio for strings (tiësto remix) or samuel barber - adagio for strings (tiësto remix) he couldn't do it without the permission of the artists. and OMG above & beyond ripped off tomaso giovanni albinoni when they named their track rollerball - albinoni or the london symphony orchestra ripped off vivaldi for example for releasing some tracks he composed on a cd. :rolleyes: plese, get your facts together before you start that pointless bashing. :wtf: :wtf: :wtf: swisstoni_uk quote: Originally posted by skip well i have no idea whatsoever what he meant and that's why i'm asking. seems more like pointless bashing to me (because tiësto isn't cool) tbh. ;) im more intelligent and mature than to "bash" artists and DJs without due reason or cause. Im merely expressing my dissapointment that there are remixes of a remix without even a hint of the original author. RebeL9 If i'm not wrong Tiesto actually used William Orbits song as the basic for his adagio for strings. Read it somewhere. Viking phynn rmx is good.... better than tiesto's rmx but ferry's one is THE story ;) CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Privacy Statement