return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > DJing / Production / Promotion > Music Producers Promotion

 
Krivi - Keep Dreaming [192kbps]
View this Thread in Original format
krivi
Please give me your feedback about my new tune:

Krivi - Keep Dreaming

thanx
krivi
can't believe...thank you very much.
ronk
take it easy mate...you wanna check my posts here at the forum? my first track is the only one which I got over 1 reply. don't know why...
you posted this yesterday...I had to wait ~ 5 days til I understood no one will comment on my track..then I posted an update and got 1 reply.

anyway I'm d/l your track now, will comment on it later :)
Sunquest
haha funny kid :D i will check ur tune as soon as i get home ;)
Klangzentrum
hey, krivi!

your track sounds very nice! perhaps try to fatten up your lead sound, and decrease the amp of the highs...too loud, imo!
you have some nice and original melodies going on...
krivi
quote:
Originally posted by Sunquest
haha funny kid :D i will check ur tune as soon as i get home ;)


i am older than you :D have a respect :D
Sunquest
quote:
Originally posted by krivi
i am older than you :D have a respect :D


but im bigger :whip: :whip:

ur sounds are very clear, but u need stronger kick, more fatter
and ur synths need some equalizing to make it sound less computery, melody could use some work

i love the part at 1:29 when it all hits, very classic style :D
also try to focus on 1 melody and make the other quiter, because there is lots going on,
thats all i got :P
keep at it m8
peace out
ronk
first thing I think you need to make your track fatter. each instrument.

and I agree with Klangzentrum and Sunquest here, your lead needs some eqing to make it sound warm and fat.

also I think you should add some more percs, the hihats and the clap aren't enough imo.

besides all that, synths are nice, melodies are good. nice track :)
keep it up.
krivi
ok thanx a lot people
dj-rob
hi there

i noticed at the beginning your eq on the hats is a 'tad' bit too much, it could have some boost lower. I notice the bass is not too defined, could compressor more or eq it up more into the mix. the closed hihats are too defined volumes could be adjusted. in my opinioon that melody/synth at 1:50 ish is brought in too fast could be either filtered up, faded up, but I wasnt expecting it. pads our a bit thin, but I like the melody you brought in at the breakdown and very good synth choice. like sunquest pointed out you need to adjust some volumes because melodies are tangling with eachother fighting for the lead spot. aside from all the critical criticism I threw at you this is a nice track, please take what I have said, along with everybody elses comments and try applying some of the tips.

Feedback and criticism are crucial in the music industry.

Sunclyder
Hi Krivi :)

Hmmm..... Song have good feelings

Not bad, but :

- percusion is weakly(kick) empty perc, bassline +/-

- fihsrt arp don't like, 2nd is good
- pad is good
- fihrst melo - shine, good instrument

- 2nd pad fine,
- 2nd melo is to shine
- sometimes bass false

Greetings from THORN
iloop
lows are weak, intro is weak, percussion elements are ok and help the track but you need to bost lows, 1st melody is ok but a bit uneventfull...pads are alright, but the main melody sounds like randomness, there's no real structure or a sense of progression- overall very basic song. keep it up, practice makes perfect and music theory helps ;).
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
 
Privacy Statement