|
Fruityloops playlist question
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Superscope |
Yo all, i have been out of producing music with fruity for a good while now.
Have recently purchased fl5 producer edition and i am having a headache with it.
I think the last version i used was fl3, and when i was laying down patterns in the playlist they would always lock in and be perfectly lined up in time with each other, whereas now when im using 5 they go exactly where i click the mouse and its nigh on impossible i find to get them to line up perfectly.
IS thier andthing i can change or a key i can hold that will make them line up perfectly when i lay them down?
Much apprecated guys! |
|
|
| coldheaven |
look here:
choose snap to line, it should work then, if not....anyone else?:) |
|
|
| Ultraphase |
In FL Studio 4, there's a dropdown menue "snap" where you can select "line", "cell", "none", "beqts", etc. You'll find it in that bar wher the clock, the play/pause button and the cpu meter is.
I think in FL Studio 5 it's similar. If not, search the help for "snap". |
|
|
| nec |
| Don't buy FL if you cant figure this out. |
|
|
| Ultraphase |
| quote: | Originally posted by nec
Don't buy FL if you cant figure this out. |
Hm... not quite wrong. But I think he wouldn't have bought it, if he didn't know the rest of FL Studio. ;) |
|
|
| Derivative |
this topic comes up every month or so. i cant remember how many there have been since ive been on this forum.
this stuff is in the manual. its in the faq on the fl studio board. and when you start up fl studio its not like its some hidden function or anything in one of the drop down menus. its right there in front of you. and its been in fl studio for ages. i cant believe some people have gotten this far without ever changing the snap parameter. i mean - what happens when you want to do 1/32nds? or 1/64ths? what happens when you want to do natural swing?! |
|
|
| Superscope |
| quote: | Originally posted by nec
Don't buy FL if you cant figure this out. |
One of the main reasons i get put off posting on ta nowadays.
You cant ask a simple friendly question looking for advice without someone making a smart remark towards you.
Fyi friend i have been producing with fruityloops and reason for years and know it inside out but, since i had a break out without using it when i come to using version five theres a couple of diffrent things im not sure about.
You obviously have assumed im a noob that has no idea what he is talking about.
Cheers to the guys who replied with usefull info that has helped me out alot! |
|
|
| Superscope |
Problem solved!
Fl3 was always set to snap to so i never had to use that feature!
I will however freely admit to being a twat for not noticing that.
Thanks for the help coldheaven and ultraphase! |
|
|
| Ultraphase |
| quote: | Originally posted by Superscope
One of the main reasons i get put off posting on ta nowadays.
You cant ask a simple friendly question looking for advice without someone making a smart remark towards you.
(...) |
Simple word:
IGNORE. ;) |
|
|
| Derivative |
| quote: | | Fyi friend i have been producing with fruityloops and reason for years and know it inside out but, since i had a break out without using it when i come to using version five theres a couple of diffrent things im not sure about. |
i see his point personally. if you have been using fl studio for years and know it inside out you would have used changed the snap function.
do you mean to say that in all these years you NEVER once used 1/4 step? you never once used swing beats? never used 64ths? it defies all logic that anyone can write music in fruity for this long without using the snap tool. otherwise it locks everything into a mechanical 16/32 step sequence. and it sounds exactly that - mechanical. the only other way to get 64ths is by changing the timebase and hardly anyone does that because it doesnt restretch patterns created in different timebases. and still no swing. no human touch.
that doesnt really bother me though. what bothers me is that all this is in the manual. part of what is somewhat depressing about seeing questions like this over and over again is that its blatantly obvious none of you even bothered to look in the manual before posting. im glad you sorted your problem out but hey - next time the first stop is the manual. always. if you cant get an answer there, the 2nd stop is the official floops forum which addresses most of the technical issues not addressed by the manual. 3rd stop is to search these forums for more specific problems. if that still turns up nothing final resort is google for the long shot.
between those you will find concise answers to 90% of all the questions posted in this forum.
i can totally see mr mystery's point of view with stuff like this. i used to think he was a hard ass but theres a pretty good reason for it. for some of the people who have been here alot longer than i have it must truly be depressing to see the same questions repeated over and over and over again, bumping all the quality posts down to the nether regions of the board. quality threads like the fight against oompa-itis just get lost amidst the slew of reiterated questions like this one.
i dont mean to on you or this thread and i apologise if it seems like a personal attack because its not intended that way at all. but this forum would be leaner and more productive without all the deadweight RTFM type threads. |
|
|
| twisted |
| quote: | Originally posted by Derivative
i see his point personally. if you have been using fl studio for years and know it inside out you would have used changed the snap function.
do you mean to say that in all these years you NEVER once used 1/4 step? you never once used swing beats? never used 64ths? it defies all logic that anyone can write music in fruity for this long without using the snap tool. otherwise it locks everything into a mechanical 16/32 step sequence. and it sounds exactly that - mechanical. the only other way to get 64ths is by changing the timebase and hardly anyone does that because it doesnt restretch patterns created in different timebases. and still no swing. no human touch.
that doesnt really bother me though. what bothers me is that all this is in the manual. part of what is somewhat depressing about seeing questions like this over and over again is that its blatantly obvious none of you even bothered to look in the manual before posting. im glad you sorted your problem out but hey - next time the first stop is the manual. always. if you cant get an answer there, the 2nd stop is the official floops forum which addresses most of the technical issues not addressed by the manual. 3rd stop is to search these forums for more specific problems. if that still turns up nothing final resort is google for the long shot.
between those you will find concise answers to 90% of all the questions posted in this forum.
i can totally see mr mystery's point of view with stuff like this. i used to think he was a hard ass but theres a pretty good reason for it. for some of the people who have been here alot longer than i have it must truly be depressing to see the same questions repeated over and over and over again, bumping all the quality posts down to the nether regions of the board. quality threads like the fight against oompa-itis just get lost amidst the slew of reiterated questions like this one.
i dont mean to on you or this thread and i apologise if it seems like a personal attack because its not intended that way at all. but this forum would be leaner and more productive without all the deadweight RTFM type threads. |
couldnt agree more. esspecially the first two paragraphs |
|
|
| nec |
| quote: | Originally posted by Derivative
i see his point personally. if you have been using fl studio for years and know it inside out you would have used changed the snap function.
do you mean to say that in all these years you NEVER once used 1/4 step? you never once used swing beats? never used 64ths? it defies all logic that anyone can write music in fruity for this long without using the snap tool. otherwise it locks everything into a mechanical 16/32 step sequence. and it sounds exactly that - mechanical. the only other way to get 64ths is by changing the timebase and hardly anyone does that because it doesnt restretch patterns created in different timebases. and still no swing. no human touch.
that doesnt really bother me though. what bothers me is that all this is in the manual. part of what is somewhat depressing about seeing questions like this over and over again is that its blatantly obvious none of you even bothered to look in the manual before posting. im glad you sorted your problem out but hey - next time the first stop is the manual. always. if you cant get an answer there, the 2nd stop is the official floops forum which addresses most of the technical issues not addressed by the manual. 3rd stop is to search these forums for more specific problems. if that still turns up nothing final resort is google for the long shot.
between those you will find concise answers to 90% of all the questions posted in this forum.
i can totally see mr mystery's point of view with stuff like this. i used to think he was a hard ass but theres a pretty good reason for it. for some of the people who have been here alot longer than i have it must truly be depressing to see the same questions repeated over and over and over again, bumping all the quality posts down to the nether regions of the board. quality threads like the fight against oompa-itis just get lost amidst the slew of reiterated questions like this one.
i dont mean to on you or this thread and i apologise if it seems like a personal attack because its not intended that way at all. but this forum would be leaner and more productive without all the deadweight RTFM type threads. |
+1 |
|
|
|
|
