|
The future of trance production (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| PutBoy |
Got my wishes though:
1. EDM will kill hip-hop ('til it dies, maddafakka! Stupid apes...)
2. As someone said, Trance will be produced by composers, I mean real ones, a new Mozart will emerge! And I will be the most famous of them all!
3. Music will be free. Copyleft will kill Copyright.
4. We will get more creative by the day. We will produce tunes no-one ever heard
5. Trance will go public, everybody would want it! (see point 1)
That's about it though... |
|
|
| EtherealSL |
| quote: | Originally posted by PutBoy
3. Music will be free. Copyleft will kill Copyright.
|
:(
| quote: | Originally posted by PutBoy
1. EDM will kill hip-hop ('til it dies, maddafakka! Stupid apes...)
|
:(:( |
|
|
| PutBoy |
| quote: | Originally posted by EtherealSL
:(
:(:( |
I mean really. Copyright is bad for both the artists and the consumers. And hiphop, well....
The only one who really benefits from copyright is a person who owns more cars than we own underwears. |
|
|
| Vespucci |
EDM will go mainstream in the States, and then it will suck. Then we'll all have to become junglists. ; D
But seriously, the super-saw has been around for about a decade. The harpsichord was around for a century. It's a convention of the genre, just as the harpsichord was a convention of baroque music. If you don't like it, don't use it, but when most people think of "trance" today, they hear that sound. Personally, yes, I've heard it a million times, we all have- but I've heard an electric guitar just as many. And by the way, the electric guitar as we know it has been around for over four decades, and it shows no signs of disappearing. I don't hear calls to extirpate the guitar from rock, and I suppose the closest rock music has had to such a thing has been the near-abolition of solos because of their extravagant overuse in the eighties.
The super-saw is part of trance. Producers use it, get tired of it, and eventually, once they've listened to 1,000+ hours of the thing, move on to other genres. I don't think that the super-saw can be completely eliminated from trance without changing the foundations of the genre. |
|
|
| Channel Surfer |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PutBoy
Got my wishes though:
2. As someone said, Trance will be produced by composers, I mean real ones, a new Mozart will emerge! And I will be the most famous of them all!
=)
That was me. And I'm ready to give you a run for your money. =) |
|
|
| DjGeMiNi529 |
lol these threads are funny
trance aint dieing its been around since before a lot of people even heard of trance.
people will always listen to trance
may it be any of the diff variations but they will listen
and it will still sell. |
|
|
| Axolotyl |
| quote: | Originally posted by DjGeMiNi529
lol these threads are funny
trance aint dieing its been around since before a lot of people even heard of trance.
people will always listen to trance
may it be any of the diff variations but they will listen
and it will still sell. |
No sherlock. No one said it was dying. Its speculation as to where trance will go in the future. Yes it will sell as long as theres DJs that want to play it, any form of music will sell. Quite frankly the most interesting music I hear is for free on forums like this. thats just too plain, wierd, and amature to actually get signed. It might not be the best quality stuff but its a hell of a lot more inspiring than most label releases. |
|
|
| dj jasonF |
| quote: | Originally posted by Axolotyl
No sherlock. No one said it was dying. Its speculation as to where trance will go in the future. Yes it will sell as long as theres DJs that want to play it, any form of music will sell. Quite frankly the most interesting music I hear is for free on forums like this. thats just too plain, wierd, and amature to actually get signed. It might not be the best quality stuff but its a hell of a lot more inspiring than most label releases. |
i agree.
and the supersaw will never die. its what makes (and made) trance what it is and maybe some day there will be very few tracks with supersaw. but then everyone who likes trance and claims that supersaws are boring, will be like omg good old times... when trance was just a massive supersaw lead. oh yea i forgot. supersaw isnt original.. the plucked gay progressive-*my-ass*(they dont even know what progressive means) plucked leads are teh original god damit... yiiiihhaaaaaaaa |
|
|
| twisted |
| quote: | Originally posted by Channel Surfer
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PutBoy
Got my wishes though:
2. As someone said, Trance will be produced by composers, I mean real ones, a new Mozart will emerge! And I will be the most famous of them all!
=)
That was me. And I'm ready to give you a run for your money. =) |
get a clue man. you know how many people have gone an made that remark?
its not a matter of better productions in terms of technicallity, its an issue of creativity, voice, spirituality...among other things. people tend take music for granted sometimes, and sometimes too seriously (i might be crossing that boundry with the spiritual comment) :happy2:)...
anyway in response to the thread topic, id personally like to see trance take a much more organic stance. its gotta loose its cookie cutter, perfected sound, over-used melodies, and the plain simplicity and formation it has garnered over the years. the music just isnt human enough. i cannot relate to it. it just tends to give me this feeling that most describe as "euphoria", a feeling that i found to be false. false for me, that is. if you get your "kicks" from one genre to another, thats nothing but great. its when people are unconsciously (a better word just doesnt come to mind) buying into this music (in its strict mainstream form). i know you've all heard rants like this before, but it always comes to mind with issues resembling these. i just hate how the mainstream is at loss to continue breaking barriers and putting out risk free music. some of this is done unconsciously and unwillingly (the amount of like-sounding music that people buy into is overwhelming), and some of it is carfully planned by industry guru's and the like. OK im digging waaay to deep into this now. i always seem to post pseudo-meaningfull, but lengthy posts that seem too gauge deep into a matter. and in the end it just leaves you scrathing your head looking for a relative ending and a point to be proven, a solution to be solved. etc. ok, im droning again. its 2:33am... im listening to some old Boris Blenn tracks...
you know how it is...
i think
:nervous: |
|
|
| twisted |
| i really tend to drone on about things...:happy2: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
| EtherealSL |
| quote: | Originally posted by PutBoy
I mean really. Copyright is bad for both the artists and the consumers. And hiphop, well....
The only one who really benefits from copyright is a person who owns more cars than we own underwears. |
what i meant was, if music was free, very talented full-time producers who just produce all day and producing IS their job, would not have any motivation to continue... good music would be hard to find if dedication isn't there
and as for rap, meh, i'm not gonna start an arguement but rap has qualities that, unfortunately, many EDM listeners will never understand and never appreciate, o wellllll |
|
|
| RiCo |
| For me, like somebody said, WE are the future of trance. So we gotta start using different synths and evolve this beast. People, pull out your Prophecies, Z1s, AN1xs, Nords...hell...even old synths...be them analog or digital...all the synths that sell for less than a Virus or JP80x0...and start making new sounds. It will be a matter of time before others jump in the bandwagon. Ditch the cookie-cutter bullsh@t and produce something new...don't worry about what others think...just do it...but do it for the love of music, not for the money. |
|
|
|
|
