|
July 1st @ (((Stereo))) (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| FunKenLouis |
by the way
too bad its not at aria... but lawler is gonna be a good party
have fun guys
:D |
|
|
| ImmyJ |
ing A this is going to be dope like an ankylosaurus (coolest dinosaur ever... check it). Questions and commentary that's sure to incite riotous, self-righteous feelings of moral superiority (that then translates into vicious sessions of autoerotic asphyxiation):
1. Where do I buy pretickets b/c, damn, everyone I know is going AND they're all polygamous weirdos?
2. ing word up to sausage parties because they're a damn sight more fun and less pretentious than a bunch of square hetero s not dancing because they might look "gay". Dude, you are gay if you worry about looking gay.
3. The underlying intolerance on this board is ing whack. Way to divide and conquer and end up exactly like your parents: square, sexless, and boring.
Paix. |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
DUDE
WTF!?!?!?!?!?!?
WTF X 20000000000000000000000000000!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| ZinG |
| wow you sound from TO |
|
|
| Tag |
| quote: | Originally posted by shawn05
:conf: |
+1 |
|
|
| fastmp3 |
| lol Epicurus will answer you ImmyJ :p |
|
|
| Epicurus |
| quote: | Originally posted by ImmyJ
ing A this is going to be dope like an ankylosaurus (coolest dinosaur ever... check it). Questions and commentary that's sure to incite riotous, self-righteous feelings of moral superiority (that then translates into vicious sessions of autoerotic asphyxiation):
1. Where do I buy pretickets b/c, damn, everyone I know is going AND they're all polygamous weirdos?
2. ing word up to sausage parties because they're a damn sight more fun and less pretentious than a bunch of square hetero s not dancing because they might look "gay". Dude, you are gay if you worry about looking gay.
3. The underlying intolerance on this board is ing whack. Way to divide and conquer and end up exactly like your parents: square, sexless, and boring.
Paix. |
Answers and pretentious mental masturbation that are sure to make your ball sack drop to your ankles, and incite knee-jerk reactions of indignation and disgust, followed hopefully by an understanding that the following was merely uttered for shock value, personal entertainment, and the opportunity to engage in ostentatious high-brow language-flinging that will necessitate the layman to go to the dictionary, or at least contemplate doing so in order to understand the previous and ensuing rambling.
Philosophically speaking, preaching tolerance of all faiths, races, sexual orientations, genders and so forth, which is what you've done in your previous paragraph, is no different from being intolerant of the aformentioned categories, in the sense that both positions are attempting to impose their respective moral positions onto others. When you're preaching tolerance, you're imposing your moral position onto those, who, for instance, are intolerant of others, and thus pushing your objective ethical system onto them. But if that is the case, then those preaching tolerance are simply contradicting the message they are attempting to promulgate, that of tolerance of others, by being intolerant of the intolerants of society. I ask you then, is it not better to be homophobic, racist, misogynistic and chauvinistic than not, considering the fact that I'm at the very least rationally consistent with the position I'm pushing? I believe so, and so do others on this board, which not only explains the underlying intolerance on this board, but also provides it with a rationally defensible position as to why we're square, sexless and obviously boring.
EDIT:/ PM 2deep for all info relevant to Stereo, including pre-sale tickets. |
|
|
| Tag |
| Epicurus, you did it again. Beautifully said. |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
| WTF ARE YOU DOING IN MATHAMATICS WOULD YOU PLEASE MAJOR IN ENG. LIT ALREADY!!!!! |
|
|
| malek |
| quote: | Originally posted by Epicurus
Answers and pretentious mental masturbation that are sure to make your ball sack drop to your ankles, and incite knee-jerk reactions of indignation and disgust, followed hopefully by an understanding that the following was merely uttered for shock value, personal entertainment, and the opportunity to engage in ostentatious high-brow language-flinging that will necessitate the layman to go to the dictionary, or at least contemplate doing so in order to understand the previous and ensuing rambling.
Philosophically speaking, preaching tolerance of all faiths, races, sexual orientations, genders and so forth, which is what you've done in your previous paragraph, is no different from being intolerant of the aformentioned categories, in the sense that both positions are attempting to impose their respective moral positions onto others. When you're preaching tolerance, you're imposing your moral position onto those, who, for instance, are intolerant of others, and thus pushing your objective ethical system onto them. But if that is the case, then those preaching tolerance are simply contradicting the message they are attempting to promulgate, that of tolerance of others, by being intolerant of the intolerants of society. I ask you then, is it not better to be homophobic, racist, misogynistic and chauvinistic than not, considering the fact that I'm at the very least rationally consistent with the position I'm pushing? I believe so, and so do others on this board, which not only explains the underlying intolerance on this board, but also provides it with a rationally defensible position as to why we're square, sexless and obviously boring.
EDIT:/ PM 2deep for all info relevant to Stereo, including pre-sale tickets. |
hahahahahaahahaha i died laughing after the first paragraph! |
|
|
| ImmyJ |
Wow, that was the most asinine response to anything, ever. Defending rights of those to be intolerant is crucial - I grant that. "Slippery slope" of making some neo-nazi head's credo illegal translating into thoughtcrime and dudes wearing dead baby masks tying my hands with duct tape at midnight. But, , have you not realized that the peeps on tranceaddict might be representing a signinfigant countercultural movement and by waving the black flag of homophobia, misogyny, etc. etc. is basically ing yourselves in terms of actually getting anything accomplished? This board, seriously, has a rich history of being dominated by close minded, patrilineal squares that morally circle jerk each other by fearing queers, women, or anything else that might call into question their unflinching and usually extremely conservative self-applied labels. Does the real possibility of organizing resistance to the ever encroaching reality of drug/lifestyle criminalization, political disinfranchisement, and generally being ed good and proper by the powers that be continually escape everyone that would rather talk about how they're "still scared of gays" and therefore alienate a group of people that essentailly share the same political and social aspirations? , can it with the bigoted bull because it's killing the vibe and whatever small (and continually shriking) chance that change is and will be possible as soon as people pull their heads out of their prejudiced asses. Paix.
Oh yeah, and someone should give the big high five to whoever organized Mutek this year. ing A. |
|
|
|
|
