|
Universe (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| washout |
| quote: | Originally posted by Jocker
1) mix vodka with any other drinks, especially beer and champaigne (vodka+champaigne is a ing nuts mix!)
2) never drink on empty stomach.
3) never brag and drink more than you can. you don't have to rush. |
i have some discrepencies.
some people can mix anything with anything.
some people can drink on an empty stomach.
and your right about bragging.
the minute u do is the hour u eat . |
|
|
| OurManFlint |
| This isn't really the best representation of a philosophical explanation for existance. In fact, there isn't just one, there is a great number, so faulty and some good. |
|
|
| Jocker |
| quote: | Originally posted by washout
some people can mix anything with anything.
some people can drink on an empty stomach.
|
maybe they just retract from the party fast enough, but believe, they end up throwing up all over the place later that night, that's guaranteed! (if they drink a pretty reasonable amount, like 10oz or more).
also, and it also has to do with bragging, some people, to show how cool they are, eat a piece of butter or margarine before they go to party. this butter creates a coating in the stomach and intestines for several hours, so the alcohol is not ingested. the person seems to drink load amounts and not be affected at all. but when that butter DOES finally ingest. BAM... the person turns into a ing manequin in a matter of five minutes:D |
|
|
| ::TranceVanDyk:: |
| quote: | Originally posted by OurManFlint
This isn't really the best representation of a philosophical explanation for existance. In fact, there isn't just one, there is a great number, so faulty and some good. |
bleh, well i just scanned these resources over. my purpose was just to provide a stepping stone for the thread starter doing his/her own research, rather than asking us, and expecting us to answer his/her question. |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by kfergs
What is the Universe for and why is It here?:conf: |
Where else would you expect it to be if not here? |
|
|
| washout |
| quote: | Originally posted by Jocker
maybe they just retract from the party fast enough, but believe, they end up throwing up all over the place later that night, that's guaranteed! (if they drink a pretty reasonable amount, like 10oz or more).
also, and it also has to do with bragging, some people, to show how cool they are, eat a piece of butter or margarine before they go to party. this butter creates a coating in the stomach and intestines for several hours, so the alcohol is not ingested. the person seems to drink load amounts and not be affected at all. but when that butter DOES finally ingest. BAM... the person turns into a ing manekin in a matter of five minutes:D |
you quoted me.
now u have been targeted for natural disaster.
yes.
i said what i said because this.
i am 160, and 6 ft 1, tall/skiny.
i can mix everything and anything, beer, rum, vegitable juice.
it dont matter.
beer vs liquor.
when it comes to 151+ of course i pace.
but i never bragg.
my friends know it and they say but i play it off and keep to myself.
i dont know what kind of queers try to fit more than they actually can with butter or whatever.
i bet they learn their lesson.
point is, everyone naturally has their limits.
i am lucky, from a perspective, to be able to consume allot.
i observe others are not in many situations, empty stomach, mixing, etc.
im not saying ive never puked, but i can put down more than the average and be fine with it.
my hangovers are very predictable weith what i consume.
and i rarely puke, but it has happened.
i need to be humbled every once in awhile.
that AND WANG CHUNG TONITE. |
|
|
| Jocker |
| quote: | Originally posted by washout
point is, everyone naturally has their limits.
|
:) you're right, everyone's limits are different.
next time, drink 8 oz of vodka and a bottle of champaigne intermittently. tell us about the results. if you don't puke, you should consider applying for guiness world record for the best alcohol mixer:):crazy: |
|
|
| washout |
| quote: | Originally posted by Jocker
:) you're right, everyone's limits are different.
next time, drink 8 oz of vodka and a bottle of champaigne intermittently. tell us about the results. if you don't puke, you should consider applying for guiness world record for the best alcohol mixer:):crazy: |
first, i dont drink champaigne.
second, like i said i dont brag.
u give me the and ill drink.
all there is to it.
please buckle your seatbelt. ty. |
|
|
| {b.s.e.} |
universe man, universe man
universe man hates triangle man |
|
|
| Aquarian |
There's always another question. For the sake of argument let's say the universe exists because god created it. So why does god exist? And why did he create the universe? Who created god? Why does this 'greater' god exist? Etcetera.
So really, you could keep on finding answers to why the universe exists by logical deduction (or scientific process), or by emotive thought (religion), but you'll never find an end to it. What you're really asking is - why does existance exist? Or simply "why?" in a general sense, to which I would answer; Why not?
| quote: |
Consider the following question: why? Stereotypes of philosophy aside, how does one answer such a question? Is there an answer at all?
It turns out that there are, in fact, exactly two ways of answering the question. The first is because; and the second, why not? By answering this question, we have abstracted and generalized every conceivable question and their answers. The former response is a generalization of logic and deduction. To answer why, we take things that are assumed to be evidently true and use them to establish a reason, because. Going back to a previous example, we may ask, "Why was Shakespeare a feminist?" To which we may reply, "Because..." and from there, we may establish a proof through logical reasoning by drawing from a range of supporting evidence, such as Shakespeare's work, or his known personality, and so on.
There is another way of answering the question why. Let us go back to the second example, where we asked ourselves, "Why do objects fall towards the Earth at 10 meters per second squared?" This time, we use the second method, and say, "Why not? Assume the contrary..." And we continue to demonstrate that the assumption of fallacy is itself false, and therefore objects must fall towards to Earth at 10 meters per second.
And thus, by answering the general (and abstract) question why, we have effectively found the methods to answer every other question of this type, and these methods are proof by deduction and proof by contradiction, respectively.
taken from: From concrete to abstract and back again by Nan Yang
|
|
|
|
| Omega_Blue |
| ultimately, if you look hard enough and examine its smallest parts, everything is made of marshmallows. Marshmallows, when made into certain things, can't be detected with the naked eye, and furthermore cannot even be detected with chemical analysis. |
|
|
|
|
