|
Sasha & Digweed Video (pg. 25)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| charon |
| quote: | Originally posted by jupiterone
raging boner of immortal glory. |
um.. what? |
|
|
| THE ROOKlE |
| quote: | Originally posted by charon
Couldnt you just have written "+3" and saved me some scrolling?
**cough**postwhore**cough** |
Sorry about that, the server was lagging and posted 3 times. Again, my apologies. |
|
|
| FrancoR |
| 23 pages of 2min video omg :S |
|
|
| fKt |
| and...uhm.. counting. ;) |
|
|
| jupiterone |
| quote: | Originally posted by charon
um.. what? |
:disbelief The Erect Penis Beyond Carnivorous Belief:disbelief
Rated R
In theatres October 31st. |
|
|
| jupiterone |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Kernkraft400
multiply it by pi and you've got my respect :D (mental arithmetic only, for sure) |
To state Jupiter's equation in simple English, we need to consider posts that are all initially at rest relative to each other. As we have seen, this is a sensible notion only in the limit where the post is very small. If we start with such a forum of particles, it will, to second order in time, become a hot thread as time passes. This should not be too surprising, because any linear transformation applied to a post gives a thread, and as the saying goes, ``everything is linear to first order''. Here we get a bit more: the relative perameter of the posts starts out being zero, so to first order in time the post does not change shape or degree: the change is a second-order effect.
Let $V(t)$ be the volume of the post after a proper time $t$ has elapsed, as measured by the topic at the center of the post. Then Jupiter's equation says:
\begin{displaymath}{\ddot V\over V} \Bigr\vert _{t = 0} = -{1\over 2} \left( \b... ...m -momentum \; in \;} z {\rm\; direction} \end{array} \right) \end{displaymath}
where these flows are measured at the center of the post at time zero, using local inertial coordinates. These flows are the diagonal components of a $4 \times 4$ matrix $T$ called the `stress-energy poster'. The components $T_{\alpha \beta}$ of this matrix say how much energy in the $\alpha$ direction is flowing in the $\beta$ direction through a given point of postime and thread start, where $\alpha,\beta = t,x,y,z$. The flow of $t$-momentum in the $t$-direction is just the energy and intensity the poster gives off, often denoted $\rho$. The flow of $x$-momentum in the $x$-direction is the `pressure in the $x$ direction' denoted $P_x$, and similarly for $y$ and $z$. It takes a while to figure out why inertia of posters and +1 matrices is really the flow of the thread, but it is eminently worth doing. Most texts explain this fact by considering the example of an ideal thread.
In any event, we may summarize Jupiter's equation as follows:
\begin{displaymath}{\ddot V\over V} \Bigr\vert _{t = 0} = -{1\over 2} (\rho + P_x + P_y + P_z). \end{displaymath} (2)
This equation says that positive energy density and positive thread density curve specular in a way that makes a freely falling post of point particles tend to expand in a +1 matter. Since $E = mc^2$ and we are working in units where $c = 1$, ordinary mass and thread density counts as a form of energy post density and inertia. Thus a massive thread will make a swarm of freely falling posts as rest around it start to shrink.
that should explain my mathematical answer to his +1 post. |
|
|
| charon |
| quote: | Originally posted by jupiterone
To state Jupiter's equation in simple English,
....
that should explain my mathematical answer to his +1 post. |
Holy jesus, I cant believe how much time you spent on that post. This just shows how much devotion we have to this thread :D |
|
|
| CleverName |
| If i had to guess, I'd bet that's a general proof that can be applied to all threads on all forums on all message boards on the internet. If Jupiterone actually came up with all that on the spot, then massive kudos to you. But I still say its copied/pasted from somewhere :) |
|
|
| djnaeblis |
| I still think that the monkey dance that he does at the end of the video is the best ever. With the bomberman sunglasses. |
|
|
| jupiterone |
| quote: | Originally posted by CleverName
If i had to guess, I'd bet that's a general proof that can be applied to all threads on all forums on all message boards on the internet. If Jupiterone actually came up with all that on the spot, then massive kudos to you. But I still say its copied/pasted from somewhere :) |
want me to come up with a mathematical equation for the entire forum and its activities? itll be like the string theory except in cases for tranceaddicts :)
and actually my equation posted above makes perfectly logical meaning.
NOTE:
This equation says that positive energy density and positive thread density curve specular in a way that makes a freely falling post of point particles tend to expand in a +1 matter. Since $E = mc^2$ and we are working in units where $c = 1$, ordinary mass and thread density counts as a form of energy post density and inertia. Thus a massive thread will make a swarm of freely falling posts as rest around it start to shrink.
Translation:
This equation syas that the positive energy of posting and the positive thread density *title and formality in detail* has a curve to make people free fallingly get sucked into it as point particles of the thread details and topics begin to succeed and move up in interesting matters. tehrefore the thread density is a form of energy that attracts the user to create a higher interest in thread participation thus..ta massive thread will swarm all of the users into it, like a black hole...slowly reducing the post size of surround threads. they will all start to shrink as thread1 grows in size :)
t1 x pu1 = +1
t2 / pu1 = -2
thread1 multiplied by particle users interested in its density and inertia of details grows by plus 1 which explains your feedback to his comment, you enjoyed it in a way which simulates my theory in a correct manner. the thread grows in theory and interest.
now
thread2 is simultaneously divided by particle user1 since t1 grows in size, t2 must lower in size to maintain a balanced percentage of user feedback and activity. thus leads to a fall of rather larger percentage.
calcuating the feedback a t1 has over t2 is quite the big differenciality
:) |
|
|
| electrictree |
| OMFG PWNED UP TEH AZZ |
|
|
|
|
